Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive versus open approach for one-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the 3- to 4-year follow-up

被引：0
|
作者：
Javier Rodríguez-Vela
Antonio Lobo-Escolar
Eduardo Joven
Javier Muñoz-Marín
Antonio Herrera
José Velilla
机构：
[1] “Miguel Servet” University Hospital,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology
[2] Aragón Health Sciences Institute,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology
[3] Barbastro Hospital,Department of Internal Medicine
[4] “Miguel Servet” University Hospital,Department of Surgery
[5] University of Zaragoza,undefined
来源：
European Spine Journal | 2013年 / 22卷
关键词：
Minimally invasive; TLIF; Lumbar fusion; Degenerative disc disease; Prospective;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：2857 / 2863
页数：6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] One-level open vs. minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and advanced meta-analytic assessment of prospective studies with at least two years follow-up
    Max Kunadt
    Luisa Barleben
    Karin Büttner-Janz
    European Spine Journal, 2022, 31 : 2557 - 2571
  • [22] Considerations When Contemplating Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Chou, Dean
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 84 (05) : 1205 - 1206
  • [23] Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience
    Constantin Schizas
    Nicolas Tzinieris
    Elefterios Tsiridis
    Victor Kosmopoulos
    International Orthopaedics, 2009, 33 : 1683 - 1688
  • [24] Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience
    Schizas, Constantin
    Tzinieris, Nicolas
    Tsiridis, Elefterios
    Kosmopoulos, Victor
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2009, 33 (06) : 1683 - 1688
  • [25] Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Following Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy Bilateral Decompression and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for One-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Hua, Wenbin
    Wang, Bingjin
    Ke, Wencan
    Xiang, Qian
    Wu, Xinghuo
    Zhang, Yukun
    Li, Shuai
    Yang, Shuhua
    Wu, Qiang
    Yang, Cao
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2021, 7
  • [26] Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive midline lumbar interbody fusion versus traditional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Djurasovic, Mladen
    Gum, Jeffrey L.
    Crawford, Charles H., III
    Owens, Kirk, II
    Brown, Morgan
    Steele, Portia
    Glassman, Steven D.
    Carreon, Leah Y.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2020, 32 (01) : 31 - 35
  • [27] Comparison of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar disease
    Guangfei Gu
    Hailong Zhang
    Guoxin Fan
    Shisheng He
    Xiaobing Cai
    Xiaolong Shen
    Xiaofei Guan
    Xu Zhou
    International Orthopaedics, 2014, 38 : 817 - 824
  • [28] The effect of a radiographic solid fusion on clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Park, Yung
    Ha, Joong Won
    Lee, Yun Tae
    Sung, Na Young
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 11 (03) : 205 - 212
  • [29] Static versus Expandable Interbody Fusion Devices: A Comparison of 1-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Ledesma, Jonathan Andrew
    Lambrechts, Mark J.
    Dees, Azra
    Thomas, Terence
    Hiranaka, Cannon Greco
    Kurd, Mark Faisal
    Radcliff, Kris E.
    Anderson, David Greg
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 17 (01)
  • [30] Long-Term Results of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Elderly Patients: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study
    Goh, Graham S.
    Tay, Adriel You Wei
    Zeng, Gerald J.
    Soh, Reuben Chee Cheong
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2025, 15 (02) : 838 - 845
12345