The comparison of edema and ecchymosis after piezoelectric and conventional osteotomy in rhinoplasty

被引:0
作者
Ümit Taşkın
Timur Batmaz
Mehmet Erdil
Salih Aydın
Kadir Yücebaş
机构
[1] Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital,Department of Otorhinolaryngology
[2] Beykent University,Department of Odiometry, Medical Faculty
[3] Bağcılar Hospitalist Hospital,undefined
来源
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | 2017年 / 274卷
关键词
Rhinoplasty; Osteotomy; Edema; Ecchymosis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The basic aim of our study is to compare the results of the conventional and piezoelectric osteotomy in rhinoplasty by complete subperiosteal degloving of nasal bone to minimize soft-tissue injury. The study was designed as a prospective, double-blind, randomized, and controlled study. Setting is a tertiary referral hospital in Turkey. Ninety patients who underwent primary open rhinoplasty with osteotomy, performed by either the conventional instruments or the piezoelectric device. The complete subperiosteal degloving of the entire nasal bone was done up to the nasal maxillary sulcus, medial canthus, and nasion in all patients, independent of the type of osteotomy device used. Patients subsequently underwent median-oblique and lateral osteotomy, either with an ultrasonic device or a conventional 2-mm guarded, straight osteotome. The postoperative edema and ecchymosis were evaluated by another surgeon who was blinded to the osteotomy procedure on postoperative days 2 and 7. The edema scores were significantly increased on the second day compared with the seventh day in both groups 1 and 2. However, there was no significant difference between groups. The ecchymosis scores were slightly higher in postoperative day 2, compared with day 7, in both groups 1 and 2, but statistically not significant. This study showed that the main reason edema and ecchymosis are seen post-rhinoplasty is related to soft-tissue injury during osteotomy.
引用
收藏
页码:861 / 865
页数:4
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
Thomas JR(1987)Steps for a safer method of osteotomies in rhinoplasty Laryngoscope 97 746-747
[2]  
Griner NR(1977)Double lateral osteotomy in rhinoplasty Arch Otolaryngol 103 344-348
[3]  
Remmler DJ(2015)SMAS debulking for management of the thick-skinned nose JAMA Fac Plast Surg 17 305-306
[4]  
Parkes ML(2012)Reverse nasal SMAS-perichondrium flap to avoid supratip deformity in rhinoplasty Aesthet Plast Surg 36 271-277
[5]  
Kamer F(1971)An aid to the treatment of supratip swelling after rhinoplasty Laryngoscope 81 308-311
[6]  
Morgan WR(1995)A new splint for the nasal tip Plast Reconstr Surg 96 189-193
[7]  
Chu E(2012)Subcutaneous approximation suture for preventing soft tissue pollybeak deformity Am J Rhinol Allergy 26 e111-e114
[8]  
Davis RE(2016)The role of piezoelectric instrumentation in rhinoplasty surgery Aesthet Surg J 36 21-34
[9]  
Arslan E(1999)Effects of single-dose steroid usage on edema, ecchymosis, and intraoperative bleeding in rhinoplasty Plast Reconstr Surg 104 2213-2218
[10]  
Gencel E(2016)How can periorbital oedema and ecchymose be reduced in rhinoplasty? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273 2549-2554