Crop Biotechnology for the Environment?

被引:0
作者
Sven Ove Hansson
Karin Joelsson
机构
[1] Royal Institute of Technology,Division of Philosophy
来源
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics | 2013年 / 26卷
关键词
Agricultural biotechnology; Genetic modification; Recombinant DNA; Agricultural ethics; Food ethics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In public debates, agricultural biotechnology is almost invariably discussed as a potential threat to the environment and to human health. Without downplaying the risks associated with this technology we emphasize that if properly regulated, it can be a forceful tool to solve environmental problems and promote human health. Agricultural biotechnology can reduce environmental problems in at least three ways: it can diminish the need for environmentally damaging agricultural practices such as pesticides, fertilizers, tillage, and irrigation. It can reduce the land area needed for agriculture, thus reducing the CO2 effect of agriculture and improving biodiversity. It can produce energy in a CO2-neutral way (especially if new technologies involving the cultivation of microalgae become successful). Furthermore, agricultural biotechnology can have positive effects on human health by decreasing occupational and dietary exposure to pesticides, improving the nutritional value of food, and producing pharmaceuticals more efficiently. We argue that those who wish to give high priority to environmental goals cannot afford any longer to be mere onlookers while others decide the future directions of agricultural biotechnology.
引用
收藏
页码:759 / 770
页数:11
相关论文
共 171 条
[1]  
Angermayr SA(2009)Energy biotechnology with cyanobacteria Current Opinion in Biotechnology 20 257-263
[2]  
Hellingwerf KJ(2005)Distinguishing International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17 63-89
[3]  
Lindblad P(2010) and Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 365 61-71
[4]  
Joost Teixeira de Mattos M(1994) biotechnology: Cultivation effects of the elite press Weed Technology 8 350-359
[5]  
Bauer MW(1995)Food security: Contributions from science to a new and greener revolution Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 92 9011-9013
[6]  
Beddington J(1974)Percentage-driven government mandates for pesticide reduction: The Swedish model Science 185 303-204
[7]  
Bellinder RR(2011)The recombinant DNA controversy: Twenty years later Nutrition Reviews 69 186-209
[8]  
Gummesson G(2008)Potential biohazards of recombinant DNA molecules Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 80 199-285
[9]  
Karlsson C(2003)Can multi-micronutrient food fortification improve the micronutrient status, growth, health, and cognition of schoolchildren? A systematic review Ecotoxicology 12 271-94
[10]  
Berg P(2010)Use of nitrogen-fixing bacteria as biofertiliser for non-legumes: Prospects and challenges AgBioForum 13 76-164