A new identification of the monkeys depicted in a Bronze Age wall painting from Akrotiri, Thera

被引:0
|
作者
Marie Nicole Pareja
Tracie McKinney
Jessica A. Mayhew
Joanna M. Setchell
Stephen D. Nash
Ray Heaton
机构
[1] University of Pennsylvania,Human Biology, School of Applied Sciences
[2] Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology,Department of Anthropology and Museum Studies
[3] University of South Wales,Department of Anthropology
[4] Central Washington University,Department of Anatomical Sciences
[5] Durham University,Primate Society of Great Britain, Linnean Society
[6] Stony Brook University,undefined
[7] Zoological Society of London,undefined
来源
Primates | 2020年 / 61卷
关键词
Vervet; Langur; Indus; Aegean; Archaeology; Trade;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Bronze Age Aegean (ca. 3500–1100 B.C.) wall paintings from the islands of Crete and Thera depict monkeys in a variety of roles such as running wild in nature, possibly following (trained) commands, and participating in sacred activities. These images, while stylistically Aegean, are traditionally considered closely related to—and descendant from—Egyptian, Near Eastern, and Mesopotamian monkey imagery. While monkey depictions in the latter regions may provide species-specific characteristics, Aegean wall paintings typically lack this level of detail. In an attempt to better understand the relationships between the monkeys depicted in Aegean wall paintings and the species that were encountered by the Aegean, Mesopotamian, and Egyptian peoples, a collaborative team of primatologists, a taxonomic illustrator, and an art historian/archaeologist identified species-indicative visual characteristics. This collaborative approach led us to identify a new region that serves as a source for monkey iconography: the Indus River Valley. With an emphasis on the primatological aspect and the growing corpus of possible Indus goods and possible species found in the Aegean, a broader iconographic and socioreligious sphere of interaction emerges. In this expanded system, Mesopotamia functions as an intermediary that enables the movement of goods, raw materials, people, and iconography between the east and west. Mesopotamia may have even afforded an opportunity for Aegean peoples to encounter the creatures themselves, first-hand. Of primary importance to the methodology employed for this project is the cooperation of scholars from disparate disciplines—the stitching together of various projects and experiences in attempt to answer both new and previously unanswerable questions. This type of interdisciplinary approach can be applied to other species, sites, paintings, and objects to hone our understanding of period, place, animal, movement, and trade.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 168
页数:9
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] A new identification of the monkeys depicted in a Bronze Age wall painting from Akrotiri, Thera
    Pareja, Marie Nicole
    McKinney, Tracie
    Mayhew, Jessica A.
    Setchell, Joanna M.
    Nash, Stephen D.
    Heaton, Ray
    PRIMATES, 2020, 61 (02) : 159 - 168
  • [3] Occam’s razor revisited: guenon species morphology supports evidence for an African influence in Bronze Age Aegean fresco primate iconography from Akrotiri, Thera
    J. D. Pruetz
    C. Greenlaw
    Primates, 2021, 62 : 703 - 707
  • [4] Occam's razor revisited: guenon species morphology supports evidence for an African influence in Bronze Age Aegean fresco primate iconography from Akrotiri, Thera
    Pruetz, J. D.
    Greenlaw, C.
    PRIMATES, 2021, 62 (05) : 703 - 707
  • [5] Wood charcoal from Santorini (Thera): new evidence for climate, vegetation and timber imports in the Aegean Bronze Age
    Asouti, E
    ANTIQUITY, 2003, 77 (297) : 471 - 484
  • [6] Volcanic ash, victims, and tsunami debris from the Late Bronze Age Thera eruption discovered at C , es , me-Bag=lararasi (Turkey)
    Sahoglu, Vasif
    Sterba, Johannes H.
    Katz, Timor
    Cayir, Umit
    Gundogan, Umit
    Tyuleneva, Natalia
    Tugcu, Irfan
    Bichler, Max
    Erkanal, Hayat
    Goodman-Tchernov, Beverly N.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2022, 119 (01)
  • [7] Woodland dynamics and use during the Bronze Age: New evidence from Irish archaeological charcoal
    O'Donnell, Lorna
    HOLOCENE, 2017, 27 (08) : 1078 - 1091
  • [8] What Happened Between Beycesultan XIII and XII? New Answers from Laodikeia-Kandilkiri Early Bronze Age Levels
    Oguzhanoglu, Umay
    ADALYA, 2021, 24 : 1 - 29
  • [9] Bronze Age diet and economy: New stable isotope data from the Central Eurasian steppes (2100-1700 BC)
    Hanks, Bryan
    Miller, Alicia Ventresca
    Judd, Margaret
    Epimakhov, Andrey
    Razhev, Dmitry
    Privat, Karen
    JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 97 : 14 - 25
  • [10] Salt or fish (or salted fish)? The Bronze Age specialised sites along the Tyrrhenian coast of Central Italy: New insights from Caprolace settlement
    Alessandri, Luca
    Achino, Katia F.
    Attema, Peter A. J.
    Nascimento, Majoi de Novaes
    Gatta, Maurizio
    Rolfo, Mario F.
    Sevink, Jan
    Sottili, Gianluca
    van Gorp, Wouter
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (11):