Impact of culture on 'partner selection criteria' in East Asian international joint ventures

被引:11
作者
Zutshi R.K. [1 ]
Tan W.L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Policy Alternatives, Delhi 110092, C-477, Yojana Vihar
[2] Singapore Management University, Singapore 178899
关键词
Alliances; China; Commitment; Confucian society; India; International joint ventures; Partner selection; Singapore; Trust;
D O I
10.1007/s11365-008-0076-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Selecting the right partner is important for the success of alliances and joint ventures. For international joint ventures (IJVs) from diverse cultures the partner selection process can become complicated. Prior studies have investigated the alliances and joint ventures to develop a set of objective criteria for evaluating potential partners. This paper reports the study of IJVs formed by Singapore firms in Peoples Republic of China and India. The intent was to develop a methodology for identifying partner selection criteria in a cross-cultural setting. The findings reveal that the partner selection process follows a different logic in Confucian societies. Trust has been established to be essential for developing enduring co-operative relationships. The paper explores the concept of trust in relation to commitment and control in the context of the Confucian culture. We discover that trust is critical to partner selection. Cultural differences do not significantly alter the partner selection criteria for Singapore firms. Results support the view that while Chinese may depend on networks for social solidarity, social trust does extends beyond the family and is necessary for harmonious and successful joint ventures. © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 393
页数:24
相关论文
共 125 条
  • [41] Glaister K., Buckley P., Task-related and partner-related selection criteria in UK international joint ventures, British Journal of Management, 8, pp. 199-222, (1997)
  • [42] Gomes-Casseres B., Ownership structure of foreign subsidiaries: Theory and evidence, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 11, pp. 1-25, (1989)
  • [43] Gouldner A., The norm of reciprocity, For Sociology
  • [44] Renewal and Critique in Sociology Today, pp. 226-259, (1973)
  • [45] Gulati R., Khanna R., Nohria N., Unilateral commitments and the i0mportance of process in alliances, Sloan Management Review, 35, 3, pp. 61-69, (1994)
  • [46] Gulati R., Does familiarity breed trust, Academy of Management Journal, 38, pp. 85-112, (1995)
  • [47] Gugler P., Building transnational alliances to create competitive advantage, Long Range Planning, 25, 6, pp. 10-17, (1992)
  • [48] Habib G., Measures of manifest conflict in international joint ventures, Academy of Management Journal, 30, 4, pp. 808-816, (1987)
  • [49] Hamel G., Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances, Strategic Management Journal, 12, pp. 83-103, (1991)
  • [50] Hamel G., Doz Y., Prahalad C.K., Collaborate with your competitors and win, Harvard Business Review, 67, 2, pp. 133-139, (1989)