The ‘chicken or the egg’: which comes first, forest tree decline or loss of mycorrhizae?

被引:0
|
作者
Sarah J. Sapsford
Trudy Paap
Giles E. St. J. Hardy
Treena I. Burgess
机构
[1] Murdoch University,School of Veterinary and Life Sciences
[2] University of Pretoria,Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute
来源
Plant Ecology | 2017年 / 218卷
关键词
Anthropogenic; Climate; Fragmentation; Heavy metals; Pathogens; Pesticides; Stressors;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Forest trees are experiencing massive declines globally caused by a multitude of stressors, both abiotic (pollution, fragmentation and climate change) and biotic (fungi, bacteria, viruses and insects). Mycorrhizal fungi aid plants in the requisition of nutrients through their mutualistic relationship with plant roots and are integral to tree health. Stresses affecting tree health will also influence mycorrhizal fungi directly or indirectly, and thus alter the pathways responsible for nutrient absorption. Such an intimate association is a true chicken or egg quandary; do external stressors cause a loss of mycorrhizae which leads to tree decline, does tree decline result in a loss of mycorrhizae, or is it a combination of both? A review of literature has identified six stressors known to contribute to tree decline and to impact directly on mycorrhizae; global climate change, pesticides, heavy metals, excess fertilizer, pathogens and habitat fragmentation. A few review papers have highlighted the link; however, what is missing is irrefutable empirical research. This review documents the known direct impacts of the six stressors on mycorrhizal communities and places this in the context of decline syndromes in long-lived forest trees. We also discuss methodologies available to identify fungi and future research needed to unravel the complex relationships between forest tree declines and their associated mycorrhizal fungi.
引用
收藏
页码:1093 / 1106
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Which came first: The chicken, the quail or the egg?
    Cancela Ferreira, C.
    Ferreira, A. R.
    Lopes, I
    ALLERGY, 2019, 74 : 314 - 314
  • [22] Commentary: Which came first, the chicken or the egg?
    Diaz-Gutierrez, Ilitch
    Andrade, Rafael S.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 158 (06): : 1707 - 1707
  • [23] Reply to 'Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and COVID-19: which comes first, the chicken or the egg?'
    Anker, Markus S.
    Tschoepe, Carsten
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2021, 23 (12) : 2092 - 2093
  • [24] REPLY FROM AUTHOR: ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AND FUNCTIONAL TRICUSPID OR MITRAL REGURGITATION: WHICH COMES FIRST, THE EGG OR THE CHICKEN?
    Coutinho, Goncalo F.
    JTCVS OPEN, 2022, 9 : 95 - 96
  • [25] Fibromyalgia and Sedentarism: Which Came First, the Chicken or the Egg?
    Quero-Calero, Carmen Daniela
    Otero, Eduardo
    Abellan-Aynes, Oriol
    Ortega, Eduardo
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (06):
  • [26] Which Came First? The Chicken or the Egg; the Troponinemia or the Stoke
    Strohbeen, S.
    Henricks, E.
    Beckert, A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2023, 71 : S271 - S271
  • [27] The Effects of Ketogenic Diet on Insulin Sensitivity and Weight Loss, Which Came First: The Chicken or the Egg?
    Paoli, Antonio
    Bianco, Antonino
    Moro, Tatiana
    Mota, Joao Felipe
    Coelho-Ravagnani, Christianne F.
    NUTRIENTS, 2023, 15 (14)
  • [28] WHICH COMES 1ST, KT/V OR PCR CHICKEN OR EGG
    LINDSAY, RM
    SPANNER, E
    HEIDENHEIM, RP
    LEFEBVRE, JM
    HODSMAN, A
    BAIRD, J
    ALLISON, MEM
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1992, 42 : S32 - S36
  • [29] Loss of heterozygosity or intragenic mutation, which comes first?
    Wilentz, RE
    Argani, P
    Hruban, RH
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2001, 158 (05): : 1561 - 1563
  • [30] WHAT COMES FIRST, THE CHICKEN OR THE EGG: THE UNDERPINNING TECHNOLOGY OR BUSINESS MODEL?
    Vinaik, Rubal
    Zubac, Angelina
    GLOBAL AND NATIONAL BUSINESS THEORIES AND PRACTICE: BRIDGING THE PAST WITH THE FUTURE, 2017, : 1906 - 1917