Quantifying the evidence for co-benefits between species conservation and climate change mitigation in giant panda habitats

被引:0
|
作者
Renqiang Li
Ming Xu
Ryan Powers
Fen Zhao
Walter Jetz
Hui Wen
Qingkai Sheng
机构
[1] Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling,
[2] Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources,undefined
[3] the Chinese Academy of Sciences,undefined
[4] 11A Datun Road,undefined
[5] Department of Ecology,undefined
[6] Evolution and Natural Resources,undefined
[7] Rutgers University,undefined
[8] Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology,undefined
[9] Yale University,undefined
[10] 165 Prospect Street,undefined
[11] College of Urban and Environmental Science,undefined
[12] Peking University,undefined
[13] 5 Yiheyuan Road,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Conservationists strive for practical, cost-effective management solutions to forest-based species conservation and climate change mitigation. However, this is compromised by insufficient information about the effectiveness of protected areas in increasing carbon storage, and the co-benefits of species and carbon conservation remain poorly understood. Here, we present the first rigorous quantitative assessment of the roles of giant panda nature reserves (NRs) in carbon sequestration, and explore the co-benefits of habitat conservation and climate change mitigation. Results show that more than 90% of the studied panda NRs are effective in increasing carbon storage, with the mean biomass carbon density of the whole NRs exhibiting a 4.2% higher growth rate compared with lands not declared as NRs over the period 1988–2012, while this effectiveness in carbon storage masks important patterns of spatial heterogeneity across the giant panda habitats. Moreover, the significant associations have been identified between biomass carbon density and panda’s habitat suitability in ~85% NRs and at the NR level. These findings suggest that the planning for carbon and species conservation co-benefits would enhance the greatest return on limited conservation investments, which is a critical need for the giant panda after its conservation status has been downgraded from “endangered” to “vulnerable”.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Climate change mitigation and co-benefits of feasible transport demand policies in Beijing
    Creutzig, Felix
    He, Dongquan
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 14 (02) : 120 - 131
  • [22] Co-benefits of integrating climate change adaptation and mitigation in the Canadian energy sector
    Hennessey, Ryan
    Pittman, Jeremy
    Morand, Annette
    Douglas, Allan
    ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 111 : 214 - 221
  • [23] Obesity and climate change mitigation in Australia: overview and analysis of policies with co-benefits
    Lowe, Melanie
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 38 (01) : 19 - 24
  • [24] Analysis of the co-benefits of climate change mitigation and air pollution reduction in China
    Jiang, Ping
    Chen, Yihui
    Geng, Yong
    Dong, Wenbo
    Xue, Bing
    Xu, Bin
    Li, Wanxin
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 58 : 130 - 137
  • [25] Health co-benefits of climate mitigation in urban areas
    Jack, Darby W.
    Kinney, Patrick L.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2010, 2 (03) : 172 - 177
  • [26] Enhanced rock weathering: biological climate change mitigation with co-benefits for food security?
    Beerling, David J.
    BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2017, 13 (04)
  • [27] Climate, weather, and child health: quantifying health co-benefits
    Dasgupta, Shouro
    Robinson, Elizabeth J. Z.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 19 (08):
  • [28] Climate change challenges the current conservation strategy for the giant panda
    Shen, Guozhen
    Pimm, Stuart L.
    Feng, Chaoyang
    Ren, Guofang
    Liu, Yanping
    Xu, Wenting
    Li, Junqing
    Si, Xingfeng
    Xie, Zongqiang
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 190 : 43 - 50
  • [29] Assessing co-benefits incentivizes climate-mitigation action
    Horton, Daniel E.
    ONE EARTH, 2021, 4 (08): : 1069 - 1070
  • [30] Co-benefits of black carbon mitigation for climate and air quality
    Mathijs J. H. M. Harmsen
    Pim van Dorst
    Detlef P. van Vuuren
    Maarten van den Berg
    Rita Van Dingenen
    Zbigniew Klimont
    Climatic Change, 2020, 163 : 1519 - 1538