Gross values: Investigating the role of disgust in bioethics

被引:0
作者
Mohima Sanyal
William H. B. McAuliffe
Oliver Scott Curry
机构
[1] University of California Riverside School of Medicine,Institute of Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology
[2] Cambridge Health Alliance,undefined
[3] University of Oxford,undefined
来源
Current Psychology | 2023年 / 42卷
关键词
Disgust; Morality; Moral emotions; Bioethics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
What is the role of disgust in moral judgements? Previous research found that disgust increases the severity of judgments; but other more recent work has cast doubt on these findings. Here we investigate roles of induced and trait disgust on moral judgments of controversial biological and medical technologies – bioethics – an area rife with proto-typical disgust cues. Participants (N = 600) viewed disgusting, frightening, or neutral pictures, rated the moral acceptability of biotechnologies, and completed questionnaire measures of trait disgust. We found a small negative effect of induced disgust (but not fear) on the acceptability of ‘existing’ biotechnology, but not ‘future’, ‘agricultural’, or ‘termination’ biotechnologies. But this effect was too small to change pre-existing opinions and would not have survived a correction for multiple tests. Although trait disgust had mostly negative relationships with the moral acceptability of biotechnologies, it did not moderate the effect of observing disgusting photos on biotechnology judgments. The larger, more consistent effects for trait disgust suggest that either (a) measures of trait disgust and moral attitudes share a source of method variance or (b) incidental, visual manipulations are too weak to capture the true effect of disgust on moral judgments.
引用
收藏
页码:2888 / 2895
页数:7
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]  
Clark LA(2019)Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments Psychological Assessment 31 1412-1427
[2]  
Watson D(2016)How disgust influences health purity attitudes Political Behavior 38 155-178
[3]  
Clifford S(2019)Mapping morality with a compass: Testing the theory of ‘morality-as-cooperation’ with a new questionnaire Journal of Research in Personality 78 106-124
[4]  
Wendell DG(2017)Understanding public perceptions of biotechnology through the “integrative worldview framework” Public Understanding of Science 26 70-88
[5]  
Curry OS(2020)“Rarely safe to assume”: Evaluating the use and interpretation of manipulation checks in experimental social psychology Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 87 103937-1160
[6]  
Jones Chesters M(2009)Statistical power analyses using G* power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses Behavior Research Methods 41 1149-385
[7]  
Van Lissa CJ(2011)Mapping the moral domain Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101 366-S94
[8]  
De Witt A(2006)Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory factor analysis framework Medical Care 44 S78-1002
[9]  
Osseweijer P(2007)The new synthesis in moral psychology Science 316 998-66
[10]  
Pierce R(2004)Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues Daedalus 133 55-976