Comparison of numerical formulations for Two-phase flow in porous media

被引:16
作者
Ataie-Ashtiani B. [1 ]
Raeesi-Ardekani D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran
关键词
Newton-Raphson; Numerical model; Picard; Primary variables; Two-phase flow;
D O I
10.1007/s10706-009-9298-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Numerical approximation based on different forms of the governing partial differential equation can lead to significantly different results for two-phase flow in porous media. Selecting the proper primary variables is a critical step in efficiently modeling the highly nonlinear problem of multiphase subsurface flow. A comparison of various forms of numerical approximations for two-phase flow equations is performed in this work. Three forms of equations including the pressure-based, mixed pressure-saturation and modified pressure-saturation are examined. Each of these three highly nonlinear formulations is approximated using finite difference method and is linearized using both Picard and Newton-Raphson linearization approaches. Model simulations for several test cases demonstrate that pressure based form provides better results compared to the pressure-saturation approach in terms of CPU_time and the number of iterations. The modification of pressure-saturation approach improves accuracy of the results. Also it is shown that the Newton-Raphson linearization approach performed better in comparison to the Picard iteration linearization approach with the exception for in the pressure-saturation form. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 389
页数:16
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Abriola L.M., Pinder G.F., A multiphase approach to the modeling of porous media contamination by organic compounds 1. Equation development, Water Resour Res, 21, 1, pp. 11-18, (1985)
[2]  
Abriola L.M., Pinder G.F., A multiphase approach to the modeling of porous media contamination by organic compounds 2. Numerical Simulation, Water Resour Res, 21, 1, pp. 19-26, (1985)
[3]  
Abriola L.M., Rathfelder K., Mass balance errors in modeling two-phase immiscible flows: Causes and remedies, Adv Water Resour, 16, pp. 223-239, (1993)
[4]  
Abroila L.M., Modeling multiphase migration of organic chemicals in groundwater systems-a review and assessment, Environ Health Perspect, 83, pp. 117-143, (1989)
[5]  
Ataie-Ashtiani B., Hassanizadeh S.M., Oostrom M., Celia M.A., White M.D., Effective parameters for two-phase flow in a porous medium with periodic heterogeneities, J Contam Hydrol, 49, 1-2, pp. 87-109, (2001)
[6]  
Ataie-Ashtiani B., Hassanizadeh S.M., Celia M.A., Effects of heterogeneities on capillary pressure-saturation-relative permeability relationships, J Contam Hydrol, 56, 3-4, pp. 175-192, (2002)
[7]  
Ataie-Ashtiani B., Hassanizadeh S.M., Oung O., Weststrate F.A., Bezuijen A., Numerical modelling of two-phase flow in a geocentrifuge, Environ Modell Softw, 18, pp. 231-241, (2003)
[8]  
Bear J., Hydraulics of Groundwater, (1979)
[9]  
Binning P., Celia M.A., Practical implementation of the fractional flow approach to multi-phase flow simulation, Adv Water Reour, 22, 5, pp. 461-478, (1999)
[10]  
Brooks R.H., Corey A.T., Hydraulic Properties of Porous Media, (1964)