The influence of site of care on the content of prenatal care for low-income women.

被引:21
作者
Kotelchuck M. [1 ]
Kogan M.D. [1 ]
Alexander G.R. [1 ]
Jack B.W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
关键词
Prenatal care; low-income women; site of care; Medicaid; WIC; content of prenatal care;
D O I
10.1023/A:1026272318642
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether site of prenatal care influences the content of prenatal care for low-income women. DESIGN: Bivariate and logistic analyses of prenatal care content for low-income women provided at five different types of care sites (private offices, HMOs, publicly funded clinics, hospital clinics, and other sites of care), controlling for sociodemographic, behavioral, and maternal health characteristics. PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 3405 low-income women selected from a nationally representative sample of 9953 women surveyed by the National Maternal and Infant Health Survey, who had singleton live births in 1988, had some prenatal care (PNC), Medicaid participation, or a family income less than $12,000/year. OUTCOME MEASURES: Maternal report of seven initial PNC procedures (individually and combined), six areas of PNC advice (individually and combined), and participation in the Women Infant Children (WIC) nutrition program. RESULTS: The content of PNC provided for low-income women does not meet the recommendations of the U.S. Public Health Service, and varies by site of delivery. Low-income women in publicly funded clinics (health departments and community health centers) report receiving more total initial PNC procedures and total PNC advice and have greater participation in the WIC program than similar women receiving PNC in private offices. CONCLUSIONS: Publicly funded sites of care appear to provide more comprehensive prenatal care services than private office settings. Health care systems reforms which assume equality of care across all sites, or which limit services to restricted sites, may foster unequal access to comprehensive PNC.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 34
页数:9
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Sokol RJ(1980)Risk, antepartum care and outcome: Impact of a maternity and infant care project Obstet Gynecol 56 150-6
[2]  
Woolf RB(1984)Risk reduction in pregnancy of low-income women Mobius 4 35-43
[3]  
Rosen MG(1991)An evaluation of the impact of maternity care coordination on Medicaid birth outcomes in North Carolina Am J Public Health 81 1625-9
[4]  
Weingarden K.(1995)TennCare—health system reform for Tennessee J Am Med Assoc 274 1235-41
[5]  
Korenbrot CC.(1987)Sources of prenatal care and infant birthweight: The case of a North Carolina county Am J Obstet Gynecol 156 204-10
[6]  
Buescher PA(1992)Improving pregnancy outcomes: Public versus private care for urban, low-income women Birth 19 123-30
[7]  
Goforth CM(1994)A comparison of low birthweight among Medicaid patients of public health departments and other providers of prenatal care in North Carolina and Kentucky Public Health Rep 107 54-9
[8]  
Roth MS(1994)Racial disparities in reported prenatal care advice from health care providers Am J Public Health 84 82-8
[9]  
Williams D.(1994)Comparing maternal reports on the content of prenatal care to recommended national guidelines Public Health Rep 109 637-46
[10]  
Mirvis DM(1991)The 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey: Design, content and data availability Birth 18 26-32