Certifiable Disability in First Episode Schizophrenia: The Role of Adherence to Antipsychotic Treatment

被引:0
作者
Kumar C.N. [1 ]
Thirthalli J. [1 ]
Yadav M. [1 ]
Gangadhar B.N. [1 ]
Varghese M. [1 ]
Cottler L.B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Hosur Road, Bangalore
[2] College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Drive, PO Box 100231, Gainesville, 32611, FL
关键词
Adherence; Antipsychotics; Disability; First episode schizophrenia;
D O I
10.1007/s40737-014-0016-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The incidence rate of schizophrenia in India is about 3 per 10,000 per year—every year around 200,000 individuals get afflicted with it. Patients with disability greater than 40 % are eligible for disability benefits from the government of India. However, it is not known as to what proportion of patients with new-onset schizophrenia would be eligible for this. At the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, 80 patients with FES were studied prospectively. Diagnosis was confirmed using the Computerized Diagnostic Interview Schedule Version-4. Disability was assessed after about 2 years of follow-up using the Indian Disability Assessment and Evaluation scale. Those with 40 % or more disability on the IDEAS were categorized as ‘disabled’. ‘Non-adherence’ was defined as a continuous 3 months period of not taking antipsychotic medication. At the end of 2 years of follow-up, 19/80 (23.8 %) of the 80 patients had met the criterion for certifiable disability. Only 3 (9.7 %) of the 31 patients who were adherent to medication met this criteria, vis-à-vis 16 (32.7 %) of the 49 who were non-adherent (p = 0.02; odds ratio = 4.52; 95 % CI: 1.2–17.2). Older age and higher psychopathology score were also associated with disability. Psychopathology emerged as a significant predictor of disability after controlling for the effects age and treatment adherence. Only a small proportion of patients with FES remain disabled if they are adherent to medications. Efforts towards enhancing adherence could be cost-effective from a public health perspective. © 2014, Springer India Pvt. Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 59
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Alvarez-Jimenez M., Parker A.G., Hetrick S.E., McGorry P.D., Gleeson J.F., Preventing the second episode: a systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial and pharmacological trials in first-episode psychosis, Schizophr Bull, 37, pp. 619-630, (2011)
[2]  
Thirthalli J., Kumar C.N., Stigma and disability in schizophrenia: developing countries’ perspective, Int Rev Psychiatry., 24, pp. 423-440, (2012)
[3]  
Persons with Disabilities Act, (1995)
[4]  
Persons with Disabilities Act
[5]  
Sanger T.M., Lieberman J.A., Tohen M., Grundy S., Beasley C., Tollefson G.D., Olanzapine versus haloperidol treatment in first-episode psychosis, Am J Psychiatry, 156, pp. 79-87, (1999)
[6]  
Lieberman J.A., Tollefson G., Tohen M., Green A.I., Gur R.E., Kahn R., Et al., Comparative efficacy and safety of atypical and conventional antipsychotic drugs in first-episode psychosis: a randomized, double-blind trial of olanzapine versus haloperidol, Am J Psychiatry, 160, pp. 1396-1404, (2003)
[7]  
Schooler N., Rabinowitz J., Davidson M., Emsley R., Harvey P.D., Kopala L., Et al., Risperidone and haloperidol in first-episode psychosis: a long-term randomized trial, Am J Psychiatry, 162, pp. 947-953, (2005)
[8]  
Wig N.N., Varma V.K., Mattoo S.K., Behere P.B., Phookan H.R., Misra A.K., Et al., An incidence study of schizophrenia in India, Indian J Psychiatry., 35, pp. 11-17, (1993)
[9]  
Rajkumar S., Padmavathi R., Thara R., Menon M.S., Incidence of schizophrenia in an urban community in madras, Indian J Psychiatry., 35, pp. 18-21, (1993)
[10]  
Thirthalli J., Channaveerachari N.K., Subbakrishna D.K., Cottler L.B., Varghese M., Gangadhar B.N., Prospective study of duration of untreated psychosis and outcome of never-treated patients with schizophrenia in India, Indian J Psychiatry., 53, pp. 319-323, (2011)