Different species trait groups of stream diatoms show divergent responses to spatial and environmental factors in a subarctic drainage basin

被引:0
作者
Marja Lindholm
Mira Grönroos
Jan Hjort
Satu Maaria Karjalainen
Laura Tokola
Jani Heino
机构
[1] University of Oulu,Geography Research Unit
[2] University of Helsinki,Department of Environmental Sciences, Section of Environmental Ecology
[3] Finnish Environment Institute,undefined
[4] Freshwater Centre,undefined
[5] Finnish Environment Institute,undefined
[6] Biodiversity Centre,undefined
来源
Hydrobiologia | 2018年 / 816卷
关键词
Ecological guilds; Ecological specialization; Environmental filtering; Spatial processes; Metacommunity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Understanding the drivers of community structure is an important topic in ecology. We examined whether different species trait groups of stream diatoms (ecological guilds and specialization groups) show divergent responses to spatial and environmental factors in a subarctic drainage basin. We used local- and catchment-scale environmental and spatial variables in redundancy analysis and variation partitioning to examine community structuring. Local and catchment conditions and spatial variables affected diatom community structure with different relative importance. Local-scale environmental variables explained most of the variation in the low-profile and motile guilds, whereas local and spatial variables explained the same amount of the variation in the high-profile guild. The variations in the planktic guild and the specialist species were best explained by spatial variables, and catchment variables explained most variation only in generalist species. Our study showed that diatom communities in subarctic streams are a result of both environmental filtering and spatial processes. Our findings also suggested that dividing whole community into different groups by species traits can increase understanding of metacommunity organization.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 230
页数:17
相关论文
共 237 条
[1]  
Alahuhta J(2014)Species sorting determines variation in the community composition of common and rare macrophytes at various spatial extents Ecological Complexity 20 61-68
[2]  
Johnson LB(2014)Variance partitioning of deconstructed periphyton communities: does the use of biological traits matter? Hydrobiologia 722 279-290
[3]  
Olker J(1998)Partitioning the variation among spatial, temporal and environmental components in a multivariate data set Australian Journal of Ecology 23 158-167
[4]  
Heino J(2012)Distance decay of similarity in freshwater communities: do macro- and microorganisms follow the same rules? Global Ecology and Biogeography 21 365-375
[5]  
Algarte VM(2010)Broad-scale environmental response and niche conservatism in lacustrine diatom communities Global Ecology and Biogeography 19 724-732
[6]  
Rodrigues L(2011)Using diatom lifeforms and ecological guilds to assess organic pollution and trophic level in rivers: a case study of rivers in southeaster France Hydrobiologia 673 259-271
[7]  
Landeiro VL(2008)Forward selection of explanatory variables Ecology 89 2623-2632
[8]  
Siqueira T(2002)All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices Ecological Modelling 153 51-68
[9]  
Bini LM(1992)Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation Ecology 73 1045-1055
[10]  
Anderson MJ(2004)Dissecting the spatial structure of ecological data at multiple scales Ecology 85 1826-1832