Towards a three-part heuristic framework for technology education

被引:0
作者
Charlotta Nordlöf
Per Norström
Gunnar Höst
Jonas Hallström
机构
[1] Linköping University,Department of Behavioral Sciences and Learning
[2] KTH Royal Institute of Technology,Department of Learning, School of Industrial Engineering and Management
[3] Linköping University,Department of Science and Technology
来源
International Journal of Technology and Design Education | 2022年 / 32卷
关键词
Technology education; Technological knowledge; Philosophy of technology; Technological literacy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There is not one single global version of technology education; curricula and standards have different forms and content. This sometimes leads to difficulties in discussing and comparing technology education internationally. Existing philosophical frameworks of technological knowledge have not been used to any great extent in technology education. In response, the aim of this article is to construct a heuristic framework for technology education, based on professional and academic technological knowledge traditions. We present this framework as an epistemological tripod of technology education with mutually supporting legs. We discuss how this tripod relates to a selection of epistemological views within the philosophy of technology. Furthermore, we apply the framework to the Swedish and English technology curricula, to demonstrate its utility as an analytic tool when discerning differences between national curricula. Each leg of the tripod represents one category of technological knowledge: (1) technical skills, (2) technological scientific knowledge and (3) socio-ethical technical understanding. The heuristic framework is a conceptual model intended for use in discussing, describing, and comparing curriculum components and technology education in general, and potentially also as support for planning and conducting technology teaching. It may facilitate common understanding of technology education between different countries and technology education traditions. Furthermore, it is a potentially powerful tool for concretising the components of technological literacy.
引用
收藏
页码:1583 / 1604
页数:21
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Ankiewicz P(2006)Some implications of the philosophy of technology for science, technology and society (STS) studies International Journal of Technology and Design Education 16 117-141
  • [2] De Swardt E(2008)On amnesia and knowing-how Techné 11 36-47
  • [3] de Vries M(2003)The nature of technological knowledge: Extending empirically informed studies into what engineers know Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 6 117-130
  • [4] Bzdak D(2005)The nature of technological knowledge: Philosophical reflections and educational consequences International Journal of Technology and Design Education 15 149-154
  • [5] de Vries MJ(2019)Operationalising pedagogical content knowledge research in technology education: Considerations for methodological approaches to exploring enacted practice British Educational Research Journal 45 755-769
  • [6] de Vries MJ(2010)The firm as an epistemic community: The knowledge-based view revisited Industrial and Corporate Change 19 1801-1828
  • [7] Doyle A(2014)The study of technology as a field of knowledge in general education: historical insights and methodological considerations from a Swedish case study, 1842–2010 International Journal of Technology and Design Education 24 121-139
  • [8] Seery N(2007)What is technological science? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 523-527
  • [9] Gumaelius L(1997)Technological literacy: Concepts and constructs The Journal of Technology Studies 23 2-5
  • [10] Håkanson L(2013)The developing field of technology education: A review to look forward International Journal of Technology and Design Education 23 191-212