Progesterone and estrogen receptors in pregnant and premenopausal non-pregnant normal human breast

被引:0
|
作者
DeShawn Taylor
Celeste Leigh Pearce
Linda Hovanessian-Larsen
Susan Downey
Darcy V. Spicer
Sue Bartow
Malcolm C. Pike
Anna H. Wu
Debra Hawes
机构
[1] University of Southern California,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine
[2] University of Southern California,Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine
[3] University of Southern California,Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine
[4] University of Southern California,Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine
[5] University of Southern California,Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine
[6] University of New Mexico,Department of Pathology
[7] University of Southern California,Department of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine
[8] USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center,undefined
来源
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2009年 / 118卷
关键词
Breast; Estrogen receptor; Progesterone receptor; Parity; Pregnancy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We report here our studies of nuclear staining for the progesterone and estrogen receptors (PRA, PRB, ERα) and cell proliferation (MIB1) in the breast terminal duct lobular unit epithelium of 26 naturally cycling premenopausal women and 30 pregnant women (median 8.1 weeks gestation). Square root transformations of the PRA, PRB and ERα values, and a logarithmic transformation of the MIB1 values, were made to achieve more normal distributions of the values. PRA expression decreased from a mean of 17.8% of epithelial cells in cycling subjects to 6.2% in pregnant subjects (P = 0.013). MIB1 expression increased from 1.7% in cycling subjects to 16.0% in pregnant subjects (P < 0.001). PRB and ERα expression was slightly lower in pregnant subjects but the differences were not statistically significant. Sixteen of the non-pregnant subjects were nulliparous and ten were parous so that we had limited power to detect changes associated with parity. PRA was statistically significantly lower in parous women than in nulliparous women (32.2% in nulliparous women vs. 10.2%; P = 0.014). PRB (23.5 vs. 12.9%), ERα (14.4 vs. 8.6%) and MIB1 (2.2 vs. 1.2%) were also lower in parous women, but the differences were not statistically significant. The marked decreases in PRA in pregnancy and in parous women has also been found in the rat. A reduction in PRA expression may be a useful marker of the reduction in risk with pregnancy and may be of use in evaluating the effect of any chemoprevention regimen aimed at mimicking pregnancy. Short-term changes in PRA expression while the chemoprevention is being administered may be a more useful marker.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 168
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Population pharmacokinetics of oseltamivir in non-pregnant and pregnant women
    Pillai, Venkateswaran C.
    Han, Kelong
    Beigi, Richard H.
    Hankins, Gary D.
    Clark, Shannon
    Hebert, Mary F.
    Easterling, Thomas R.
    Zajicek, Anne
    Ren, Zhaoxia
    Caritis, Steve N.
    Venkataramanan, Raman
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 80 (05) : 1042 - 1050
  • [22] Evaluation of anaerobic threshold in non-pregnant and pregnant rats
    Netto, Aline Oliveira
    Macedo, Nathalia C. D.
    Gallego, Franciane Q.
    Sinzato, Yuri K.
    Volpato, Gustavo T.
    Damasceno, Debora C.
    ANAIS DA ACADEMIA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS, 2017, 89 (04): : 2749 - 2756
  • [23] Distress levels in pregnant and matched non-pregnant women
    Barber, Carol Cornsweet
    Steadman, Jessica
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 58 (01) : 128 - 131
  • [24] Dietary behaviour of pregnant versus non-pregnant women
    Verbeke, Wim
    De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse
    APPETITE, 2007, 48 (01) : 78 - 86
  • [25] The composition and stability of the vaginal microbiota of normal pregnant women is different from that of non-pregnant women
    Romero, Roberto
    Hassan, Sonia S.
    Gajer, Pawel
    Tarca, Adi L.
    Fadrosh, Douglas W.
    Nikita, Lorraine
    Galuppi, Marisa
    Lamont, Ronald F.
    Chaemsaithong, Piya
    Miranda, Jezid
    Chaiworapongsa, Tinnakorn
    Ravel, Jacques
    MICROBIOME, 2014, 2
  • [26] Eating habits of pregnant and non-pregnant women: are there differences?
    Gomes, Caroline de Barros
    Malta, Maira Barreto
    de Almeida Martiniano, Ana Carolina
    Di Bonifacio, Luiza Pereira
    de Barros Leite Carvalhaes, Maria Antonieta
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2015, 37 (07): : 325 - 332
  • [27] The composition and stability of the vaginal microbiota of normal pregnant women is different from that of non-pregnant women
    Roberto Romero
    Sonia S Hassan
    Pawel Gajer
    Adi L Tarca
    Douglas W Fadrosh
    Lorraine Nikita
    Marisa Galuppi
    Ronald F Lamont
    Piya Chaemsaithong
    Jezid Miranda
    Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa
    Jacques Ravel
    Microbiome, 2
  • [28] The angiography of uterine arteries in non-pregnant, pregnant, and twin-pregnant sheep
    Mogheiseh, Asghar
    Hashemipour, Seyed Mohammad Amin
    Khetvan, Reza
    Rointan, Maedeh
    Mokhtari, Fariba
    Ahrari-Khafi, Mohammad Saeed
    Nowroozi, Mohsen
    SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH, 2024, 231
  • [29] Evaluation of Breast Milk in Lactating Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Mothers. Is it a Crime for the Pregnant Woman to Breastfeed her Infant?
    Mohamed, M. El-Meligui
    LIFE SCIENCE JOURNAL-ACTA ZHENGZHOU UNIVERSITY OVERSEAS EDITION, 2011, 8 (03): : 295 - 298
  • [30] Blood pressure and heart rate in pregnant and non-pregnant bitches
    Cahua, U. Jacqueline
    Gavidia, C. Cesar
    REVISTA DE INVESTIGACIONES VETERINARIAS DEL PERU, 2023, 34 (01):