Progesterone and estrogen receptors in pregnant and premenopausal non-pregnant normal human breast

被引:0
|
作者
DeShawn Taylor
Celeste Leigh Pearce
Linda Hovanessian-Larsen
Susan Downey
Darcy V. Spicer
Sue Bartow
Malcolm C. Pike
Anna H. Wu
Debra Hawes
机构
[1] University of Southern California,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine
[2] University of Southern California,Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine
[3] University of Southern California,Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine
[4] University of Southern California,Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine
[5] University of Southern California,Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine
[6] University of New Mexico,Department of Pathology
[7] University of Southern California,Department of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine
[8] USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center,undefined
来源
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2009年 / 118卷
关键词
Breast; Estrogen receptor; Progesterone receptor; Parity; Pregnancy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We report here our studies of nuclear staining for the progesterone and estrogen receptors (PRA, PRB, ERα) and cell proliferation (MIB1) in the breast terminal duct lobular unit epithelium of 26 naturally cycling premenopausal women and 30 pregnant women (median 8.1 weeks gestation). Square root transformations of the PRA, PRB and ERα values, and a logarithmic transformation of the MIB1 values, were made to achieve more normal distributions of the values. PRA expression decreased from a mean of 17.8% of epithelial cells in cycling subjects to 6.2% in pregnant subjects (P = 0.013). MIB1 expression increased from 1.7% in cycling subjects to 16.0% in pregnant subjects (P < 0.001). PRB and ERα expression was slightly lower in pregnant subjects but the differences were not statistically significant. Sixteen of the non-pregnant subjects were nulliparous and ten were parous so that we had limited power to detect changes associated with parity. PRA was statistically significantly lower in parous women than in nulliparous women (32.2% in nulliparous women vs. 10.2%; P = 0.014). PRB (23.5 vs. 12.9%), ERα (14.4 vs. 8.6%) and MIB1 (2.2 vs. 1.2%) were also lower in parous women, but the differences were not statistically significant. The marked decreases in PRA in pregnancy and in parous women has also been found in the rat. A reduction in PRA expression may be a useful marker of the reduction in risk with pregnancy and may be of use in evaluating the effect of any chemoprevention regimen aimed at mimicking pregnancy. Short-term changes in PRA expression while the chemoprevention is being administered may be a more useful marker.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 168
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Progesterone and estrogen receptors in pregnant and premenopausal non-pregnant normal human breast
    Taylor, DeShawn
    Pearce, Celeste Leigh
    Hovanessian-Larsen, Linda
    Downey, Susan
    Spicer, Darcy V.
    Bartow, Sue
    Pike, Malcolm C.
    Wu, Anna H.
    Hawes, Debra
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2009, 118 (01) : 161 - 168
  • [2] Expression of estrogen receptors α and β in the corpus luteum and uterus from non-pregnant and pregnant llamas
    Powell, Susan A.
    Smith, Bradford B.
    Timm, Karen I.
    Menino, Alfred R., Jr.
    MOLECULAR REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 74 (08) : 1043 - 1052
  • [3] Jugular and ovarian venous profiles of progesterone and associated endometrial progesterone concentrations in pregnant and non-pregnant ewes
    Abecia, JA
    Rhind, SM
    Goddard, PJ
    McMillen, SR
    Ahmadi, S
    Elston, DA
    ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1996, 63 : 229 - 234
  • [4] The Non-pregnant and Pregnant Human Cervix: a Systematic Proteomic Analysis
    Carrie E. Barnum
    Snehal S. Shetye
    Hossein Fazelinia
    Benjamin A. Garcia
    Shuyang Fang
    Maria Alzamora
    Hongyu Li
    Lewis M. Brown
    Chuanning Tang
    Kristin Myers
    Ronald Wapner
    Louis J. Soslowsky
    Joy Y. Vink
    Reproductive Sciences, 2022, 29 : 1542 - 1559
  • [5] The Non-pregnant and Pregnant Human Cervix: a Systematic Proteomic Analysis
    Barnum, Carrie E.
    Shetye, Snehal S.
    Fazelinia, Hossein
    Garcia, Benjamin A.
    Fang, Shuyang
    Alzamora, Maria
    Li, Hongyu
    Brown, Lewis M.
    Tang, Chuanning
    Myers, Kristin
    Wapner, Ronald
    Soslowsky, Louis J.
    Vink, Joy Y.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2022, 29 (05) : 1542 - 1559
  • [6] Plasma adiponectin concentrations in non-pregnant, normal and overweight pregnant women
    Nien, Jyh Kae
    Mazaki-Tovi, Shali
    Romero, Roberto
    Erez, Offer
    Kusanovic, Juan Pedro
    Gotsch, Francesca
    Pineles, Beth L.
    Gomez, Ricardo
    Edwin, Samuel
    Mazor, Moshe
    Espinoza, Jimmy
    Yoon, Bo Hyun
    Hassan, Sonia S.
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (06) : 522 - 531
  • [7] Progesterone and estrogen receptors segregate into different cell subpopulations in the normal human breast
    Hilton, H. N.
    Graham, J. D.
    Kantimm, S.
    Santucci, N.
    Cloosterman, D.
    Huschtscha, L. I.
    Mote, P. A.
    Clarke, C. L.
    MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2012, 361 (1-2) : 191 - 201
  • [8] Reconstituted normal human breast in nude mice: Estrogen and progesterone receptors regulation
    Yang, J
    Guzman, R
    Nandi, S
    IN VIVO, 2001, 15 (03): : 239 - 244
  • [9] Antigen-presenting Cells in Pregnant and Non-pregnant Human Myometrium
    Ivanisevic, Marina
    Segerer, Sabine
    Rieger, Lorenz
    Kapp, Michaela
    Dietl, Johannes
    Kaemmerer, Ulrike
    Frambach, Torsten
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE IMMUNOLOGY, 2010, 64 (03) : 188 - 196
  • [10] Dietary habits of pregnant and non-pregnant adolescents
    Derbyshire, E.
    NUTRITION & FOOD SCIENCE, 2009, 39 (05) : 490 - 498