Actinic Keratosis—Can Dermoscopy or RCM Differentiate AK (Not Full Thickness Atypia) from Full-Thickness Atypia/Invasive SCC?

被引：0

作者：

Combalia A. ^{[1
]}

Fustà-Novell X. ^{[1
]}

Alejo B. ^{[1
]}

Domínguez M. ^{[1
]}

Barreiro A. ^{[1
]}

Carrera C. ^{[1
,2
,3
]}

机构：

[1] Melanoma Unit, Dermatology Department, Hospital Clínic & IDIBAPS (Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer), C/ Villarroel 170, Barcelona

[2] Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona

[3] Centro Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Barcelona

来源：

Current Dermatology Reports | 2018年 / 7卷 / 2期

基金：

美国国家卫生研究院;

关键词：

Actinic keratosis; Cancerization field; Dermoscopy; Reflectance confocal microscopy; Squamous cell carcinoma;

D O I：

10.1007/s13671-018-0219-8

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Purpose of Review: Actinic keratosis (AK) is the most common sun-induced preneoplastic lesion, and together with photo-aging and skin cancer, it places a huge burden on healthcare systems. The clinical distinction between AK and incipient squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) can be difficult, and therefore, clinical diagnosis is not always reliable and certain. Skin biopsies are sometimes mandatory, and physicians must be aware of the importance of accurate diagnosis and management, as other malignant neoplasms (melanoma, basal cell carcinoma) cannot always be reliably distinguished from AK, especially when pigmented and inflamed. Recent Findings: Although histopathology remains the gold standard for differentiation of AK from SCC, some non-invasive optical technologies such as dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy have recently been applied to enhance clinical diagnosis accuracy and to obtain an in vivo characterization of these lesions. Summary: The combination of dermoscopy with reflectance confocal microscopy improves the clinical assessment and diagnosis of equivocal keratinizing tumors, allows the selection of the most suspicious areas for biopsy, and permits non-invasive determination of treatment outcomes. © 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

引用

页码：75 / 83

页数：8

共 23 条

[1]

Callen J.P., Bickers D.R., Moy R.L., Actinic keratoses, J Am Acad Dermatol, 36, pp. 650-653, (1997)

[2]

Pellacani G., Ulrich M., Casari A., Et al., Grading keratinocyte atypia in actinic keratosis: a correlation of reflectance confocal microscopy and histopathology, J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 29, 11, pp. 2216-2221, (2015)

[3]

Ackerman A.B., Mones J.M., Solar (actinic) keratosis is squamous cell carcinoma, Br J Dermatol, 155, 1, pp. 9-22, (2006)

[4]

Peppelman M., Nguyen K.P., Hoogedoorn L., van Erp P.E.J., Gerritsen M.-J.P., Reflectance confocal microscopy: non-invasive distinction between actinic keratosis and squamous cell carcinoma, J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 29, 7, pp. 1302-1309, (2015)

[5]

Marks R., Rennie G., Selwood T., Malignant transformation of solar keratoses to squamous cell carcinoma, Lancet, 331, 8589, pp. 795-797, (1988)

[6]

Quaedvlieg P.J.F., Tirsi E., Thissen M.R.T.M., Krekels G.A., Actinic keratosis: how to differentiate the good from the bad ones?, Eur J Dermatology, 16, 4, pp. 335-339, (2006)

[7]

Ulrich M., Stockfleth E., Roewert-Huber J., Astner S., Noninvasive diagnostic tools for nonmelanoma skin cancer, Br J Dermatol, 157, pp. 56-58, (2007)

[8]

Warszawik-Hendzel O., Olszewska M., Maj M., Rakowska A., Czuwara J., Rudnicka L., Non-invasive diagnostic techniques in the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma, J Dermatol Case Rep, 9, 4, pp. 89-97, (2015)

[9]

Moscarella E., Rabinovitz H., Zalaudek I., Piana S., Stanganelli I., Oliviero M.C., Lallas A., Ardigo M., Cota C., Catricala C., Mazzoni L., Pellacani G., Argenziano G., Longo C., Dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy of pigmented actinic keratoses: a morphological study, J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 29, 2, pp. 307-314, (2015)

[10]

Rosendahl C., Cameron A., Argenziano G., Zalaudek I., Tschandl P., Kittler H., Dermoscopy of squamous cell carcinoma and keratoacanthoma, Arch Dermatol, 148, 12, pp. 1386-1392, (2012)

← 1 2 3 →