Environmental regulation and productivity: testing the porter hypothesis

被引:0
作者
Paul Lanoie
Michel Patry
Richard Lajeunesse
机构
[1] École des Hautes Études Commerciales,
[2] CIRANO,undefined
来源
Journal of Productivity Analysis | 2008年 / 30卷
关键词
Porter hypothesis; Environmental regulation; Productivity; Q52; Q55; Q58;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 128
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Antweiler W(2001)Is free trade good for the environment? Am Econ Rev 91 877-908
  • [2] Copeland BR(2001)Environmental Regulation and productivity: evidence from oil refineries Rev Econ Stat 83 498-510
  • [3] Taylor MS(2003)Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries J Environ Econ Manage 45 278-293
  • [4] Berman E(1998)Regulation and productivity J Prod Anal 9 233-247
  • [5] Bui LTM(1987)The Cost of regulation: OSHA, EPA and the productivity slowdown Am Econ Rev 77 998-1006
  • [6] Brunnermeier SB(1997)Environmental regulation and innovation: a panel data study Rev Econ Stat 79 610-619
  • [7] Cohen MA(1995)Environmental regulation and international competitiveness: what does the evidence tell us? J Econ Lit 93 12658-12663
  • [8] Dufour C(1992)The impact of occupational safety and health regulation on the risk of workplace accidents: Quebec, 1983–87 J Hum Resour 27 643-660
  • [9] Lanoie P(1995)Thightening environmental standards: the benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? J Econ Perspect 9 119-132
  • [10] Patry M(2006)International innovation and diffusion of air pollution control technologies: the effects of NOX and SO2 regulation in the US, Japan, and Germany J Environ Econ Manage 51 46-71