The use of time during lexical processing and segmentation: A review

被引:0
作者
Sven L. Mattys
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook,Department of Psychology
来源
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review | 1997年 / 4卷
关键词
Word Recognition; Speech Perception; Lexical Access; Lexical Processing; Word Boundary;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Speech, by its very nature, is a time-based phenomenon. Speech sounds are temporally distributed, with the presentation of one sound roughly conditioned by the fading of the previous one. In this review, three classes of models are discussed with respect to the sequential nature of speech. It is argued that the three resulting conceptions of time are linked to the type of segmentation process proposed by these models to deal with speech continuity. In the first one, lexical activation is viewed as perfectly synchronized with the temporal deployment of speech. This type of model corresponds to the traditional left-to-right (proactive) account of lexical processing. Because serious segmentation problems exist for such an approach (e.g.,car andcard are embedded incardinal), the second type of model treats word recognition as the result of a mechanism that sometimes delays commitment on word identity beyond word offset. Lexical activation, instead of shadowing the unfolding of time, lags behind it until an unambiguous decision can be made. The temporarily unprocessed information is stored in a memory buffer. In the third approach, a prosodic cue (lexical stress) contributes actively to speech segmentation and lexical processing. Every stressed syllable encountered in the signal is postulated as a word onset and thus constitutes the starting point of lexical activation. However, with non-initial-stressed words, retroactive procedures going “back in time” must be used. Finally, the use of time (including proactive, delayed, and retroactive procedures) is discussed in light of cross-linguistic phonological differences.
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 329
页数:19
相关论文
共 276 条
[1]  
Allen G. D.(1967)Two behavioral experiments on the location of the syllable beat in spoken American English Studies in Language & Language Behavior 4 2-179
[2]  
Altmann G.(1989)Lexical stress and lexical discriminability: Stressed syllables are more informative, but why? Computer Speech & Language 3 265-275
[3]  
Carter D.(1994)On metrical patterns and lexical parsing in French Speech Communication 15 115-126
[4]  
Banel M.-H.(1988)The recognition of words after their acoustic offsets in spontaneous speech: Effects of subsequent context Perception & Psychophysics 44 395-408
[5]  
Bacri N.(1961)Identification and discrimination of phonemic contrast induced by silent interval [Abstract] Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 33 842-842
[6]  
Bard E. G.(1971)Units in speech perception Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 9 1-112
[7]  
Shillcock R. C.(1983)Voicing, vowel, and stress mispronunciations in continuous speech Perception & Psychophysics 34 470-474
[8]  
Altmann G. T. M.(1989)Context and lexical access: Implications of nonword interference for lexical ambiguity resolution Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 15 620-632
[9]  
Bastian J.(1982)Some suffix effects on lipread lists Canadian Journal of Psychology 36 509-515
[10]  
Eimas P.(1990)Similarity neighborhoods of spoken two-syllable words: Retroactive effects on multiple activation Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 16 551-563