Economic Development And Environmental Protection: An Ecological Economics Perspective

被引:0
作者
William E. Rees
机构
[1] University of British Columbia,School of Community and Regional Planning
来源
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment | 2003年 / 86卷
关键词
carrying capacity; dissipative structure; ecological crisis; ecological deficit; ecological economics; ecological footprint; expansionism; growth model; human ecological dysfunction; human evolution; natural capital; paradigm; paradigm shift; patch disturbance; second law of thermodynamics; self-organization; steady-state; social capital; sustainability; worldview;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper argues on both theoretical and empirical grounds that, beyond a certain point, there is an unavoidable conflictbetween economic development (generally taken to mean 'materialeconomic growth') and environmental protection. Think for a moment of natural forests, grasslands, marine estuaries, salt marshes, and coral reefs; and of arable soils, aquifers, mineraldeposits, petroleum, and coal. These are all forms of 'natural capital' that represent highly-ordered self-producing ecosystemsor rich accumulations of energy/matter with high use potential (low entropy). Now contemplate despoiled landscapes, eroding farmlands, depleted fisheries, anthropogenic greenhouse gases,acid rain, poisonous mine tailings and toxic synthetic compounds.These all represent disordered systems or degraded forms of energy and matter with little use potential (high entropy). The main thing connecting these two states is human economic activity. Ecological economics interprets the environment-economyrelationship in terms of the second law of thermodynamics. The second law sees economic activity as a dissipative process. Fromthis perspective, the production of economic goods andservices invariably requires the consumption of available energy and matter. To grow and develop, the economynecessarily 'feeds' on sources of high-quality energy/matter first produced by nature. This tends to disorder and homogenizethe ecosphere, The ascendance of humankind has consistently been accompanied by an accelerating rate of ecological degradation, particularly biodiversity loss, the simplificationof natural systems and pollution. In short, contemporary political rhetoric to the contrary, the prevailing growth-oriented global development paradigm is fundamentally incompatible with long-term ecological and social sustainability. Unsustainability is not a technical nor economic problem as usually conceived, but rather a state of systemic incompatibilitybetween a economy that is a fully-contained, growing, dependent sub-system of a non-growing ecosphere. Potential solutions fly inthe face of contemporary development trends and cultural values.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 45
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Economic, institutional and environmental drivers of SMEs' development in the EU: sustainable development goals perspective [J].
Tu, Yu-Xia ;
Kubatko, Oleksandr ;
Melnyk, Leonid ;
Li, Rui ;
Kovalov, Bohdan ;
Yaremenko, Anastasia .
ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 27 (08) :20101-20119
[32]   Searching for a Scientific Paradigm in Ecological Economics: The History of Ecological Economic Thought, 1880s-1930s [J].
Franco, Marco P. V. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 153 :195-203
[33]   ECOLOGICAL PROJECTS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - A CASE STUDY OF GALVANIC CELL MANUFACTURER [J].
Goralski, Blazej ;
Grabowska, Marta ;
Studzinski, Adam ;
Maletic, Matjai ;
Maletic, Damjan .
MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION ENGINEERING REVIEW, 2020, 11 (04) :129-137
[34]   Models of Environmental Behavior in Ecological Economics: A Literature Review [J].
Mondejar Jimenez, Jose ;
Vargas Vargas, Manuel .
ESTUDIOS DE ECONOMIA APLICADA, 2018, 36 (01) :309-316
[35]   Development of Ecological Footprint to an Essential Economic and Political Tool [J].
Aubauer, Hans P. .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2011, 3 (04) :649-665
[36]   NORMATIVE ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS AS A CONDITION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT [J].
Sleszynski, Jerzy .
EKONOMIA I SRODOWISKO-ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 83 (04) :8-19
[37]   Development of ecological economics in Australia and New Zealand [J].
Patterson, MG .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 56 (03) :312-331
[38]   A comprehensive framework for detecting economic growth expenses under ecological economics principles in China [J].
Fang, Zhou ;
Wang, Huimin ;
Xue, Shi ;
Zhang, Fan ;
Wang, Yixin ;
Yang, Shiliang ;
Zhou, Qin ;
Cheng, Changgao ;
Zhong, Yuchun ;
Yang, Yang ;
Liu, Gang ;
Chen, Junyu ;
Qiu, Lei ;
Zhi, Yanling .
SUSTAINABLE HORIZONS, 2022, 4
[39]   An ecological footprint approach to environmental-economic evaluation of farm results [J].
Blasi, E. ;
Passeri, N. ;
Franco, S. ;
Galli, A. .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2016, 145 :76-82
[40]   Empiricism in ecological economics: a perspective from complex systems theory [J].
Ramos-Martin, J .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 46 (03) :387-398