Supporting Kindergarten Teachers’ Mathematics Instruction and Student Achievement Through a Curriculum-Based Professional Development Program

被引:1
作者
Drew Polly
Chuang Wang
Richard Lambert
Christie Martin
Jennifer Richardson McGee
David Pugalee
Amy Lehew
机构
[1] UNC Charlotte,Department of Reading and Elementary Education
[2] UNC Charlotte,Center for Educational Measurement and Evaluation
[3] Appalachian State University,Center for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education
[4] UNC Charlotte,undefined
[5] Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools,undefined
来源
Early Childhood Education Journal | 2017年 / 45卷
关键词
Kindergarten; Mathematics education; Professional development; Reform-oriented pedagogies; Common Core;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study investigates the impacts of a year-long professional development program on Kindergarten teachers’ beliefs and practices and the association of these changes with student achievement in mathematics measured by curriculum-based instruments. Although teacher content knowledge was not statistically significantly different before and after participation in the program, changes in teachers’ beliefs and practices were both noticed: a trend towards discovery/connectionist orientation and student-centered practices. Teachers’ gain scores on a measure of mathematics content knowledge was positively related to the linear growth rate of student achievement.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 131
页数:10
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Borko H(2004)Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain Educational Researcher 33 3-15
[2]  
Carpenter TP(1996)Cognitively guided instruction: A knowledge base for reform in primary mathematics instruction Elementary School Journal 97 1-20
[3]  
Fennema E(1989)Randomized intervention analysis and the interpretation of whole ecosystem experiments Ecology 70 1142-1152
[4]  
Franke ML(2006)Practicing change: Curriculum adaptation and teacher narrative in the context of mathematics education reform Curriculum Inquiry 36 153-187
[5]  
Carpenter SR(1996)A longitudinal study of learning to use children’s thinking in mathematics in-struction Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 27 403-434
[6]  
Frost TM(2000)Professional development that works: What makes professional development effective? Phi Delta Kappan 84 748-750
[7]  
Heisey D(1979)Two-sample Psychological Bulletin 86 1255-1263
[8]  
Kratz T(2008) procedure and the assumption of homogeneous covariance matrices Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 39 113-152
[9]  
Drake C(1997)Studying the effects of professional development: The case of the NSF’s local systemic change through teacher enhancement initiative Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 28 524-549
[10]  
Sherin MG(2004)Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning Journal of Research in Mathematics Education 55 330-351