Symptom and Performance Validity Assessment in European Countries: an Update

被引:0
作者
Thomas Merten
Brechje Dandachi-FitzGerald
Vicki Hall
Thomas Bodner
Luciano Giromini
Johann Lehrner
Héctor González-Ordi
Pablo Santamaría
Ben Schmand
Giuseppe Di Stefano
机构
[1] Vivantes Klinikum Im Friedrichshain,Department of Neurology
[2] Maastricht University,Department of Clinical Psychological Science
[3] Neuromindworks Director,Department of Neurology
[4] Medical University of Innsbruck,Department of Psychology
[5] University of Turin,Department of Neurology
[6] Medical University of Vienna,Faculty of Psychology
[7] Complutense University of Madrid,Brain & Cognition
[8] TEA Ediciones,undefined
[9] University of Amsterdam,undefined
[10] IB-Bern GmbH,undefined
来源
Psychological Injury and Law | 2022年 / 15卷
关键词
Validity; Symptom validity test; Performance validity test; Malingering; Psychological assessment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In 2013, a special issue of the Spanish journal Clínica y Salud published a review on symptom and performance validity assessment in European countries (Merten et al. in Clínica y Salud, 24(3), 129–138, 2013). At that time, developments were judged to be in their infancy in many countries, with major publication activities stemming from only four countries: Spain, The Netherlands, Great Britain, and Germany. As an introduction to a special issue of Psychological Injury and Law, this is an updated report of developments during the last 10 years. In that period of time, research activities have reached a level where it is difficult to follow all developments; some validity measures were newly developed, others were adapted for European languages, and validity assessment has found a much stronger place in real-world evaluation contexts. Next to an update from the four nations mentioned above, reports are now given from Austria, Italy, and Switzerland, too.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 127
页数:11
相关论文
共 339 条
[1]  
Ægisdóttir S(2006)The meta-analysis of clinical judgment project: Fifty-six years of accumulated research on clinical versus statistical prediction The Counseling Psychologist 34 341-382
[2]  
White MJ(2014)How do experts reporting for the legal process validate symptoms? The results of a survey Medicine, Science and the Law 54 68-73
[3]  
Spengler PM(2010)Conference report: The first european symposium on symptom validity assessment (May 8–9 2009) Zeitschrift Für Neuropsychologie 21 65-483
[4]  
Maugherman AS(2021)Detecting coached feigning of schizophrenia with the inventory of problems–29 (IOP-29) and its memory module (IOP-M): A simulation study on a French community sample International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 41 476-108
[5]  
Anderson LA(2019)Performance validity measures in clinical patients with aphasia Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 21 103-10
[6]  
Cook RS(2006)A single case report of recurrent surgery for chronic back pain and its implications concerning a diagnosis of Münchausen syndrome Functional Neurology 25 4-461
[7]  
Nichols CN(2014)Detección de exageración de síntomas en esguince cervical: Pacientes clínicos versus sujetos análogos [Detection of symptom exaggeration in whiplash: Patients versus analogue participants] Trauma 23 446-111
[8]  
Lampropoulos GK(2015)Fraudulently claiming following a road traffic accident: A pilot study of UK residents’ attitudes Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 30 89-70
[9]  
Walker BS(2019)Mission impossible? Assessing the veracity of a mental health problem as result of a road traffic accident: A preliminary review of UK experts’ practices Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 14 58-204
[10]  
Cohen G(2021)Discriminating feigned from credible PTSD symptoms: A validation of a Brazilian version of the inventory of problems–29 (IOP-29) Psychological Injury and Law 51 199-281