Robust maximum marginal likelihood (RMML) estimation for item response theory models

被引:0
作者
Maxwell R. Hong
Ying Cheng
机构
[1] University of Notre Dame,Department of Psychology
来源
Behavior Research Methods | 2019年 / 51卷
关键词
Item response theory; Careless responses; Person fit; Robust estimation; Robust maximum marginal likelihood;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Self-report data are common in psychological and survey research. Unfortunately, many of these samples are plagued with careless responses, due to unmotivated participants. The purpose of this study was to propose and evaluate a robust estimation method to detect careless or unmotivated responders, while leveraging item response theory (IRT) person-fit statistics. First, we outlined a general framework for robust estimation specific for IRT models. Subsequently, we conducted a simulation study covering multiple conditions in order to evaluate the performance of the proposed method. Ultimately, we showed that robust maximum marginal likelihood (RMML) estimation significantly improves detection rates for careless responders and reduces bias in item parameters across conditions. Furthermore, we applied our method to a real data set, to illustrate the utility of the proposed method. Our findings suggest that robust estimation coupled with person-fit statistics offers a powerful procedure to identify careless respondents for further review and to provide more accurate item parameter estimates in the presence of careless responses.
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 588
页数:15
相关论文
共 143 条
[51]  
Felt JM(2014)Expectations for replications Perspectives on Psychological Science 9 305-390
[52]  
Castaneda R(1983)Developing a common metric in item response theory Applied Psychological Measurement 7 201-673
[53]  
Tiemensma J(1990)The effect of uncertainty of item parameter estimation on ability estimates Psychometrika 55 371-254
[54]  
Depaoli S(2016)Linking item response model parameters Psychometrika 81 650-364
[55]  
Ferrando PJ(2018)A two-stage approach to differentiating normal and aberrant behavior in computer based testing Psychometrika 83 223-490
[56]  
Huang JL(2017)Multidimensional modeling of traits and response styles European Journal of Psychological Assessment 33 352-298
[57]  
Curran PG(2009)A clarification of the effects of rapid guessing on coefficient: A note on Attali’s reliability of speeded number-right multiple-choice tests Applied Psychological Measurement 33 488-165
[58]  
Keeney J(2003)Estimating the effects of test length and test time on parameter estimation using the hybrid model ETS Research Report Series 1995 277-368
[59]  
Poposki EM(2004)Three Mahalanobis distances and their role in assessing unidimensionality British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 57 151-136
[60]  
DeShon RP(2008)Outliers, leverage observations, and influential cases in factor analysis: Using robust procedures to minimize their effect Sociological Methodology 38 329-undefined