Testing genotypic variation of an invasive plant species in response to soil disturbance and herbivory

被引:0
作者
Shannon L. J. Bayliss
Casey P. terHorst
Jennifer A. Lau
机构
[1] California State University,Biology Department
[2] Northridge,W.K. Kellogg Biological Station
[3] Michigan State University,Department of Plant Biology
[4] Michigan State University,undefined
来源
Oecologia | 2017年 / 183卷
关键词
Biological invasion; Genotype-by-environment interaction; Genetic variation; Herbivory; Tolerance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Herbivores, competitors, and predators can inhibit biological invasions (“biotic resistance” sensu Elton 1959), while disturbance typically promotes biological invasions. Although biotic resistance and disturbance are often considered separately in the invasion literature, these two forces may be linked. One mechanism by which disturbance may facilitate biological invasions is by decreasing the effectiveness of biotic resistance. The effects of both disturbance and biotic resistance may vary across invading genotypes, and genetic variation in the invasive propagule pool may increase the likelihood that some genotypes can overcome biotic resistance or take greater advantage of disturbance. We conducted an experimental field trial in which we manipulated soil disturbance (thatch removal and loosening soil) and the presence of insect herbivores and examined their effects on the invasion success of 44 Medicago polymorpha genotypes. As expected, insecticide reduced leaf damage and increased Medicago fecundity, suggesting that insect herbivores in this system provide some biotic resistance. Soil disturbance increased Medicago fecundity, but did not alter the effectiveness of biotic resistance by insect herbivores. We found significant genetic variation in Medicago in response to disturbance, but not in response to insect herbivores. These results suggest that the ability of Medicago to invade particular habitats depends on the amount of insect herbivory, the history of disturbance in the habitat, and how the specific genotypes in the invader pool respond to these factors.
引用
收藏
页码:1135 / 1141
页数:6
相关论文
共 176 条
[1]  
Barney JN(2005)Differences in invasibility of two contrasting habitats and invasiveness of two mugwort J Appl Ecol 42 567-576
[2]  
Di Tommaso A(2006) populations Ecol Lett 9 887-895
[3]  
Weston LA(2013)Interactions between resource availability and enemy release in plant invasion J Ecol 101 418-429
[4]  
Blumenthal D(2009)Plant apparency, an overlooked driver of associational resistance to insect herbivory Divers Distrib 15 22-40
[5]  
Castagneyrol B(2009)Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework Oikos 118 1679-1686
[6]  
Giffard B(2000)Propagule pressure and disturbance interact to overcome biotic resistance of marine invertebrate communities J Ecol 88 528-534
[7]  
Péré C(2001)Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility Ecol Lett 4 421-428
[8]  
Jactel H(1998)Experimental support for a resource-based mechanistic model of invasibility Crop Sci 38 1558-1561
[9]  
Catford JA(2005)Inheritance of pod type, stem color, and dwarf growth habit in Ecol Appl 15 1273-1283
[10]  
Jansson R(2013)Physical factors vs. biotic resistance in controlling the invasion of an estuarine marsh grass Evol Appl 6 721-734