Improved detection of Rhodococcus coprophilus with a new quantitative PCR assay

被引:0
作者
Melanie Wicki
Adrian Auckenthaler
Richard Felleisen
Marianne Liniger
Caroline Loutre
Isabel Niederhauser
Marcel Tanner
Andreas Baumgartner
机构
[1] Federal Office of Public Health,
[2] Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute,undefined
[3] University of Basel,undefined
[4] Office of Environmental Protection and Energy,undefined
[5] University of Lausanne,undefined
来源
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology | 2012年 / 93卷
关键词
Contamination; LightCycler; Sewage; Validation; Water quality;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Agricultural practices, such as spreading liquid manure or the utilisation of land as animal pastures, can result in faecal contamination of water resources. Rhodococcus coprophilus is used in microbial source tracking to indicate animal faecal contamination in water. Methods previously described for detecting of R. coprophilus in water were neither sensitive nor specific. Therefore, the aim of this study was to design and validate a new quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to improve the detection of R. coprophilus in water. The new PCR assay was based on the R. coprophilus 16S rRNA gene. The validation showed that the new approach was specific and sensitive for deoxyribunucleic acid from target host species. Compared with other PCR assays tested in this study, the detection limit of the new qPCR was between 1 and 3 log lower. The method, including a filtration step, was further validated and successfully used in a field investigation in Switzerland. Our work demonstrated that the new detection method is sensitive and robust to detect R. coprophilus in surface and spring water. Compared with PCR assays that are available in the literature or to the culture-dependent method, the new molecular approach improves the detection of R. coprophilus.
引用
收藏
页码:2161 / 2169
页数:8
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]  
Bustin SA(2006)Swiss Accreditation Service: Leitfaden zur Validierung mikrobiologischer Prüfverfahren und zur Abschätzung der Messunsicherheit im Bereich Lebensmittel- und Umweltmikrobiologie Mitt Lebensm Hyg 97 73-106
[2]  
Benes V(2009)The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments Clin Chem 55 611-622
[3]  
Garson JA(1991)Phenotypic differentiation of bifidobacteria of human and animal origins Int J Syst Bacteriol 41 548-557
[4]  
Hellemans J(1990)F-specific RNA bacteriophages and sensitive host strains in faeces and wastewater of human and animal origin J Appl Bacteriol 69 30-37
[5]  
Huggett J(1995)Evaluation of indicators for assessment of human and animal faecal pollution of surface run-off Water Sci Technol 31 235-241
[6]  
Kubista M(2006)Development of Appl Environ Microbiol 72 4214-4224
[7]  
Mueller R(2003) 16S rRNA gene TaqMan-based real-time PCR assays for estimation of total, human, and bovine fecal pollution in water J Water SRT Aqua 52 565-575
[8]  
Nolan T(1981)Evaluation of three source tracking indicator organisms for watershed management Appl Environ Microbiol 42 1037-1042
[9]  
Pfaffl MW(1983)Occurrence of J Appl Bacteriol 55 349-357
[10]  
Shipley GL(2004) and associated actinomycetes in feces, sewage, and freshwater J Environ Manage 73 71-79