Gynephilic Men’s Self-Reported and Genital Sexual Responses to Relationship Context Cues

被引:0
作者
Amanda D. Timmers
Meredith L. Chivers
机构
[1] Queen’s University,Department of Psychology
来源
Archives of Sexual Behavior | 2018年 / 47卷
关键词
Sexual psychophysiology; Sexual arousal; Relationship context; Gender-specificity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The current study examined men’s sexual responses to relationship context. Chivers and Timmers (2012) previously reported that heterosexual men’s genital and self-reported sexual arousal varied by gender but not relationship context, suggesting that gender cues are more salient determinants of sexual response than relationship context cues for men. Those analyses were, however, significantly underpowered to detect relationship context effects (n = 9). The current study utilized the same paradigm as Chivers and Timmers’ study, exposing a larger sample of heterosexual men (n = 26) to audio narratives describing sexual interactions that varied by partner gender (man, woman) and relationship context (stranger, friend, long-term relationship), and observing effects on genital and self-reported sexual response. Results indicated that men’s genital response to relationship context cues mirrored those previously reported for heterosexual women (Chivers & Timmers, 2012); heterosexual men demonstrated less genital response to the friend than to the stranger or long-term relationship conditions. No significant effect of relationship context was found for men’s self-reported sexual arousal. These data suggest that, in addition to gender cues, relationship cues may also be an important determinant of men’s genital sexual responses.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 625
页数:8
相关论文
共 114 条
[1]  
Afifi WA(2000)On being just friends: The frequency and impact of sexual activity in crosssex friendships Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 17 205-222
[2]  
Faulkner SL(2009)Negotiating a friends with benefits relationship Archives of Sexual Behavior 38 66-73
[3]  
Bisson MA(2014)The role of conditioning, learning and dopamine in sexual behavior: A narrative review of animal and human studies Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 38 38-59
[4]  
Levine TR(2013)Gender differences in sexual arousal and affective responses to erotica: The effects of type of film and fantasy instructions Archives of Sexual Behavior 42 1011-1019
[5]  
Brom M(2011)Patterns of sexual arousal in homosexual, bisexual, and heterosexual men Archives of Sexual Behavior 40 687-697
[6]  
Both S(2010)A brief update on the specificity of sexual arousal Sexual and Relationship Therapy 25 407-414
[7]  
Laan E(2017)The specificity of women’s sexual response and its relationship with sexual orientations: A review and ten hypotheses Archives of Sexual Behavior 46 1161-1179
[8]  
Everaerd W(2005)A sex difference in features that elicit genital response Biological Psychology 70 115-120
[9]  
Spinhoven P(2015)Straight but not narrow; Within-gender variation in the gender-specificity of women’s sexual response PLoS ONE 10 e0142575-744
[10]  
Carvalho J(2004)A sex difference in the specificity of sexual arousal Psychological Science 15 736-1121