Development and Evaluation of Patient Education Materials for Elderly Lung Cancer Patients

被引:0
作者
Natalie Jewitt
Andrew J. Hope
Robin Milne
Lisa W. Le
Janet Papadakos
Nazek Abdelmutti
Pamela Catton
Meredith E. Giuliani
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Cancer Centre,Radiation Medicine Program
[2] Princess Margaret Cancer Centre,Department of Biostatistics
[3] Princess Margaret Cancer Centre,Patient Education and Survivorship
[4] Princess Margaret Cancer Centre,ELLICSR Wellness Program
[5] University of Toronto,Department of Radiation Oncology
来源
Journal of Cancer Education | 2016年 / 31卷
关键词
Stereotactic body radiotherapy; Lung cancer; Patient education; Older adults; Health literacy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Patients treated for lung cancer are often elderly presenting a unique challenge for developing patient education materials. This study developed and evaluated a patient education pamphlet on lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) designed specifically for an elderly population. The SBRT pamphlet was developed using a participatory design involving a convenience sample of patients. This prospective study assessed patient’s opinions of pamphlet effectiveness through self-report questionnaires. The pamphlet was deemed “effective” if patients rated 16/18 evaluation statements as “strongly agree” or “agree.” Demographic data and health literacy (Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine short-form (REALM-SF)) were also assessed. Patient opinion of pamphlet “effectiveness” was compared between patients with REALM-SF scores of 7 versus <7 using Fisher’s exact test. The overall EQ-5D-5L score was compared for patients who did and did not find the pamphlet effective using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. Thirty-seven patients participated. The median age was 76 years (range 56–93) and 22 patients (59 %) had ≤high school education. Most patients preferred to have verbal (65 %) or written (78 %) educational materials as opposed to online information or educational classes. Thirty-two patients (86 %) rated the pamphlet as effective. The proportion of patients who found the pamphlet effective was 85.7 versus 86.7 % (p = 1.00) in those with REALM 7 versus <7. The mean EQ-5D score was 67.5 (SD 19.1) versus 71.8 (SD 8.7) (p = 0.84) in those who found the pamphlet effective versus not. Participatory design is an effective method for developing education materials for challenging patient groups such as elderly patients. Despite advanced age and comorbidity, this patient group had adequate health literacy.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 74
页数:4
相关论文
共 99 条
[11]  
Higgins J(2006)Limited literacy and mortality in the elderly: the health, aging, and body composition study J Gen Intern Med 21 806-812
[12]  
Bezjak A(2010)Surgery versus stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage lung cancer: who’s down for the count? J clin oncol: off j Am Soc Clin Oncol 28 907-909
[13]  
Halkett GK(2010)The influence of easy-to-read pamphlets about self-care management of radiation side effects on patient’s knowledge Oncol Nurs Forum 37 774-781
[14]  
Arbon P(2007)Retention and use of breast cancer recurrence risk information from genomic tests: the role of health literacy Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 16 249-255
[15]  
Scutter SD(2010)Investigating the impact of socioeconomic status on the effectiveness of a pamphlet on achieving and maintaining bone health in breast cancer survivors: a patient education resource development primer J Cancer Educ 27 54-58
[16]  
Borg M(2007)Development and validation of a short-form, rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine Med Care 45 1026-1033
[17]  
Halkett GK(2011)Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of eq-5d (eq-5d-5l) Qual Life Res 20 1727-1736
[18]  
Kristjanson LJ(2007)Psychometric comparison of the standard eq-5d to a 5 level version in cancer patients Med Care 45 259-263
[19]  
Lobb E(2005)The prevalence of limited health literacy J Gen Intern Med 20 175-184
[20]  
Little J(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined