Identification of candidate genes for an early-maturing soybean mutant by genome resequencing analysis

被引:0
作者
Kyung Jun Lee
Dong Sub Kim
Jin-Baek Kim
Sung-Hwan Jo
Si-Yong Kang
Hong-Il Choi
Bo-Keun Ha
机构
[1] Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute,Radiation Breeding Research Team, Advanced Radiation Technology Institute
[2] National Agrobiodiversity Center,Division of Plant Biotechnology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
[3] NAAS,undefined
[4] RDA,undefined
[5] Chonnam National University,undefined
[6] Seeders Inc.,undefined
来源
Molecular Genetics and Genomics | 2016年 / 291卷
关键词
Early flowering; Gamma-ray; Mutation; Resequencing; Soybean;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Flowering is indicative of the transition from vegetative to reproductive phase, a critical event in the life cycle of plants. In this study, we performed whole genome resequencing by Illumina HiSeq to identify changes in flowering genes using an early-flowering phenotype of soybean mutant line Josaengserori (JS) derived from Korean landrace, Seoritae (SR), and we obtained mapped reads of 131,769,690 and 167,669,640 bp in JS and SR, respectively. From the whole genome sequencing results between JS and SR, we identified 332,821 polymorphic SNPs and 65,178 indels, respectively. Among these, 30 flowering genes were in SNPs and 25 were in indels. Among 30 flowering genes detected in SNPs, Glyma02g33040, Glyma06g22650, Glyma10g36600, Glyma13g01290, Glyma14g10530, Glyma16g01980, Glyma17g11040, Glyma18g53690, and Glyma20g29300 were non-synonymous substitutions between JS and SR. Changes in Glyma10g36600 (GI), Glya02g33040 (AGL18), Glyma17g11040 (TOC1), and Glyma14g10530 (ELF3) in JS affected the expression of GmFT2a and resulted in early flowering. These results provide insight into the regulatory pathways of flowering in soybean mutants and help to improve our knowledge of soybean mutation breeding.
引用
收藏
页码:1561 / 1571
页数:10
相关论文
共 305 条
[1]  
Adamczyk BJ(2007)The MADS domain factors AGL15 and AGL18 act redundantly as repressors of the floral transition in Plant J 50 1007-1019
[2]  
Lehti-Shiu MD(2004)Global impact of mutation-derived varieties Euphytica 135 187-204
[3]  
Fernandez DE(2001)Reciprocal regulation between TOC1 and LHY/CCA1 within the Science 293 880-883
[4]  
Ahloowalia BS(1995) circadian clock Free Radic Biol Med 18 1033-1077
[5]  
Maluszynski M(2010)Reactions of Oxyl Radicals with DNA BMC Bioinform 11 485-490
[6]  
Nichterlein K(2007)SolexaQA: At-a-glance quality assessment of Illumina second-generation sequencing data Genetics 176 1501-1510
[7]  
Alabadi D(2014)A complex genetic interaction between Plant Physiol 165 1591-1603
[8]  
Oyama T(1999) TOC1 and CCA1/LHY in driving the circadian clock and in output regulation EMBO J 118 4679-4688
[9]  
Yanovsky MJ(1990)The MADS-domain factors AGAMOUS-LIKE15 and AGAMOUS-LIKE18, along with SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE and AGAMOUS-LIKE24, are necessary to block floral gene expression during the vegetative phase Int J Radiat Biol 58 397-415
[10]  
Harmon FG(2010)GIGANTEA: a circadian clock-controlled gene that regulates photoperiodic flowering in Plant Cell Physiol 51 936-948