Higher sensitivity in the detection of inflammatory brain lesions in patients with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis using high field MRI: an intraindividual comparison of 1.5 T with 3.0 T

被引:0
作者
Mike P. Wattjes
Götz G. Lutterbey
Michael Harzheim
Jürgen Gieseke
Frank Träber
Luisa Klotz
Thomas Klockgether
Hans H. Schild
机构
[1] University of Bonn,Department of Radiology
[2] University of Bonn,Department of Neurology
[3] Philips Medical Systems,undefined
来源
European Radiology | 2006年 / 16卷
关键词
High-field MRI; Multiple sclerosis; Clinically isolated syndrome; Magnetic field strength;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivities in the detection of inflammatory lesions in patients with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis at 3.0 T and 1.5 T. MR imaging of 40 patients at both field strengths was performed in separate sessions including contiguous axial slices of T2 turbo spin-echo (T2 TSE), fluid-attenuated-inversion-recovery (FLAIR) and pre- and postcontrast T1 spin-echo (T1 SE). Inflammatory lesions >3 mm in size were counted and categorized according to their anatomic location. Lesion conspicuity was assessed on a five-point scale. At 3.0 T, 13% more white matter lesions could be identified on the FLAIR sequence and on the T2 TSE sequence. Compared to 1.5 T 7.5% more contrast-enhancing lesions were detected at 3.0 T. The higher detection rate at 3.0 T was significant for the infratentorial (p=0.02) and juxtacortical (p<0.01) region on the FLAIR as well as for the infratentorial (p=0.03), juxtacortical (p=0.02) and periventricular (p=0.03) region on the T2 TSE sequence. The lesion conspicuity was significantly better at 3.0 T for FLAIR and T2 TSE sequences (p<0.01; p=0.01). In conclusion, high-field MRI at 3.0 T provides a significantly higher detection rate of inflammatory brain lesions especially in the infratentorial, juxtacortical and periventricular anatomic region.
引用
收藏
页码:2067 / 2073
页数:6
相关论文
共 98 条
  • [1] Paty DW(1988)MRI in the diagnosis of MS: a prospective study with comparison of clinical evaluation, evoked potentials, oligoclonal banding, and CT Neurology 38 180-185
  • [2] Oger JJF(1986)Disseminated lesions at presentation with optic neuritis J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 49 124-127
  • [3] Kastrukoff LF(1987)The role of NMR imaging in the assessment of multiple sclerosis and isolated neurological lesions Brain 110 1579-1616
  • [4] Omerod IEC(1997)Comparison of MRI criteria at first presentation to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis Brain 120 2059-2069
  • [5] McDonald WI(2000)Isolated demyelinating syndromes: comparison of different MR imaging criteria to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21 702-706
  • [6] duBoulay EPGH(2001)Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis Ann Neurol 50 121-127
  • [7] Omerod IEC(2005)Diagnostic criteria for Multiple Sclerosis: Revisions to the “McDonald criteria” Ann Neurol 58 840-846
  • [8] Miller DH(2002)Application of the New McDonald Criteria to patients with Clinically Isolated Syndromes Suggestive of Multiple Sclerosis Ann Neurol 52 47-53
  • [9] McDonald WI(2003)New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis. Application in first demyelinating episode Neurology 60 27-30
  • [10] Barkhof F(1997)Comparison of MR pulse sequences in the detection of multiple sclerosis lesions AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 18 959-963