Clinical value of regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement

被引:0
作者
Sayuri Yamabe
Yoshihiro Dohi
Akifumi Higashi
Hiroki Kinoshita
Yoshiharu Sada
Takayuki Hidaka
Satoshi Kurisu
Nobuo Shiode
Yasuki Kihara
机构
[1] Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences,Department of Cardiovascular Medicine
[2] Tsuchiya General Hospital,Department of Cardiology
来源
Heart and Vessels | 2016年 / 31卷
关键词
Aortic valve replacement; Aortic stenosis; Left ventricular hypertrophy; Electrocardiogram; Reverse remodeling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (ECG-LVH) gradually regressed after aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Sokolow–Lyon voltage (SV1 + RV5/6) is possibly the most widely used criterion for ECG-LVH. The aim of this study was to determine whether decrease in Sokolow–Lyon voltage reflects left ventricular reverse remodeling detected by echocardiography after AVR. Of 129 consecutive patients who underwent AVR for severe aortic stenosis, 38 patients with preoperative ECG-LVH, defined by SV1 + RV5/6 of ≥3.5 mV, were enrolled in this study. Electrocardiography and echocardiography were performed preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The patients were divided into ECG-LVH regression group (n = 19) and non-regression group (n = 19) according to the median value of the absolute regression in SV1 + RV5/6. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess determinants of ECG-LVH regression among echocardiographic indices. ECG-LVH regression group showed significantly greater decrease in left ventricular mass index and left ventricular dimensions than Non-regression group. ECG-LVH regression was independently determined by decrease in the left ventricular mass index [odds ratio (OR) 1.28, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.03–1.69, p = 0.048], left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (OR 1.18, 95 % CI 1.03–1.41, p = 0.014), and left ventricular end-systolic dimension (OR 1.24, 95 % CI 1.06–1.52, p = 0.0047). ECG-LVH regression could be a marker of the effect of AVR on both reducing the left ventricular mass index and left ventricular dimensions. The effect of AVR on reverse remodeling can be estimated, at least in part, by regression of ECG-LVH.
引用
收藏
页码:1497 / 1503
页数:6
相关论文
共 161 条
  • [1] Greve AM(2012)Clinical implications of electrocardiographic left ventricular strain and hypertrophy in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis: the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis study Circulation 125 346-353
  • [2] Boman K(2014)Left ventricular hypertrophy with strain and aortic stenosis Circulation 130 1607-1616
  • [3] Gohlke-Baerwolf C(1949)The ventricular complex in left ventricular hypertrophy as obtained by unipolar precordial and limb leads Am Heart J 37 161-186
  • [4] Kesäniemi YA(2009)The decrease in QRS amplitude after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic valve stenosis J Electrocardiol 42 410-413
  • [5] Nienaber C(1996)Left ventricular mass regression early after aortic valve replacement Ann Thorac Surg 62 1084-1089
  • [6] Ray S(2002)Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with the mosaic bioprosthesis J Heart Valve Dis 11 529-536
  • [7] Egstrup K(1988)Time course of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement Circulation 77 1345-1355
  • [8] Rossebø AB(1990)Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement measured by ultrafast computed tomography Am Heart J 120 919-927
  • [9] Devereux RB(2006)Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement predominantly affects patients with preexisting left ventricular dysfunction: effect on survival, freedom from heart failure, and left ventricular mass regression J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 131 1036-1044
  • [10] Køber L(2005)Patient-prosthesis mismatch in aortic valve replacement: really tolerable? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 27 441-449