Fusion of GNSS and InSAR time series using the improved STRE model: applications to the San Francisco Bay Area and Southern California

被引:0
作者
Huineng Yan
Wujiao Dai
Lei Xie
Wenbin Xu
机构
[1] Central South University,School of Geosciences and Info
[2] The Hong Kong Polytechnic University,Physics
来源
Journal of Geodesy | 2022年 / 96卷
关键词
Deformation; Spatio-temporal random effects model; Data fusion; GNSS; InSAR time series; High spatio-temporal resolution;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The spatio-temporal random effects (STRE) model is a classic dynamic filtering model, which can be used to fuse GNSS and InSAR deformation data. The STRE model uses a certain time span of high spatial resolution Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) time series data to establish a spatial model and then obtain a deformation result with high spatio-temporal resolution through the state transition equation recursively in time domain. Combined with the Kalman filter, the STRE model is continuously updated and modified in time domain to obtain higher accuracy result. However, it relies heavily on the prior information and personal experience to establish an accurate spatial model. To the authors' knowledge, there are no publications which use the STRE model with multiple sets of different deformation monitoring data to verify its applicability and reliability. Here, we propose an improved STRE model to automatically establish accurate spatial model to improve the STRE model, then apply it to the fusion of GNSS and InSAR deformation data in the San Francisco Bay Area covering approximately 6000 km2 and in Southern California covering approximately 100,000 km2. Our experimental results show that the improved STRE model can achieve good fusion effects in both study areas. For internal inspection, the average error RMS values in the two regions are 0.13 mm and 0.06 mm for InSAR and 2.4 and 2.8 mm for GNSS, respectively; for Jackknife cross-validation, the average error RMS values are 6.0 and 1.3 mm for InSAR and 4.3 and 4.8 mm for GNSS in the two regions, respectively. We find that the deformation rate calculated from the fusion results is highly consistent with the existing studies, the significant difference in the deformation rate on both sides of the major faults in the two regions can be clearly seen, and the area with abnormal deformation rate corresponds well to the actual situation. These results indicate that the improved STRE model can reduce the reliance on prior information and personal experience, realize the effective fusion of GNSS and InSAR deformation data in different regions, and also has the advantages of high accuracy and strong applicability.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 128 条
[11]  
Bürgmann R(2018)A comprehensive analysis of geodetic slip-rate estimates and uncertainties in CaliforniaA comprehensive analysis of geodetic slip-rate estimates and uncertainties in California Bull Seismol Soc Am 57 319-328
[12]  
Hilley G(2018)Integration of GNSS and satellite InSAR data: derivation of fine-scale vertical surface motion maps of Po Plain, Northern Apennines, and Southern Alps, Italy IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 51 4249-4259
[13]  
Ferretti A(2013)DEM error correction in InSAR time series IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 28 3063-3066
[14]  
Novali F(2001)The complete (3-D) surface displacement field in the epicentral area of the 1999 Mw7. 1 Hector Mine earthquake, California, from space geodetic observations Geophys Res Lett 104 1122-1180
[15]  
Cao Y(2014)Uniform California earthquake rupture forecast, version 3 (UCERF3)—the time-independent model Bull Seismol Soc Am 105 511-543
[16]  
Li Z(2015)Long-term time-dependent probabilities for the third uniform California earthquake rupture forecast (UCERF3) Bull Seismol Soc Am 11 241-631
[17]  
Wei J(2019)Resolving three-dimensional surface motion with InSAR: Constraints from multi-geometry data fusion Remote Sensing 203 614-1458
[18]  
Carlà T(2015)Estimation of small surface displacements in the upper rhine graben area from a combined analysis of PS-InSAR, levelling and GNSS data Geophys J Int 181 1441-338
[19]  
Tofani V(2010)Mixed linear—non-linear inversion of crustal deformation data: Bayesian inference of model, weighting and regularization parameters Geophys J Int 72 320-28
[20]  
Lombardi L(1977)Maximum likelihood approaches to variance component estimation and to related problems J Am Stat Assoc 758 12-213