Heritability of Individual Differences in Cortical Processing of Facial Affect

被引:0
|
作者
Andrey P. Anokhin
Simon Golosheykin
Andrew C. Heath
机构
[1] Washington University School of Medicine,Department of Psychiatry
来源
Behavior Genetics | 2010年 / 40卷
关键词
Facial affect; Brain; ERP; Individual differences; Genetics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Facial expression of emotion is a key mechanism of non-verbal social communication in humans. Deficits in processing of facial emotion have been implicated in psychiatric disorders characterized by abnormal social behavior, such as autism and schizophrenia. Identification of genetically transmitted variability in the neural substrates of facial processing can elucidate the pathways mediating genetic influences on social behavior and provide useful endophenotypes for psychiatric genetic research. This study examined event-related brain potentials (ERPs) evoked by changes in facial expression in adolescent twins (age 12, 47 monozygotic and 51 dizygotic pairs). Facial images with happy, fearful, and neutral expressions were administered in a continuous mode, such that different expressions of the same face instantaneously replaced each other. This experimental design allowed us to isolate responses elicited by changes in emotional expression that were not confounded with responses elicited by image onset. Changes of emotional expression elicited a N240 wave with a right temporoparietal maximum and a P300 wave with a centropariatal midline maximum. Genetic analyses using a model fitting approach showed that a substantial proportion of the observed individual variation in these ERP responses can be attributed to genetic factors (36–64% for N250 and 42–62% for P300 components, respectively). This study provides the first evidence for heritability of neuroelectric indicators of face processing and suggests that ERP components sensitive to emotional expressions can potentially serve as endophenotypes for psychpathology characterized by abnormalities in social cognition and behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 185
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Individual differences in negative affect repair
    Hemenover, Scott H.
    Augustine, Adam A.
    Shulman, Tirza
    Tran, Tuan Q.
    Barlett, Christopher P.
    EMOTION, 2008, 8 (04) : 468 - 478
  • [12] Neural Correlates of Individual Differences in Strategic Retrieval Processing
    Bridger, Emma K.
    Herron, Jane E.
    Elward, Rachael L.
    Wilding, Edward L.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2009, 35 (05) : 1175 - 1186
  • [13] Reliable individual differences in fine-grained cortical functional architecture
    Ma Feilong
    Nastase, Samuel A.
    Guntupalli, J. Swaroop
    Haxby, James V.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2018, 183 : 375 - 386
  • [14] Individual differences in posterior cortical volume correlate with proneness to pride and gratitude
    Zahn, Roland
    Garrido, Griselda
    Moll, Jorge
    Grafman, Jordan
    SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 9 (11) : 1676 - 1683
  • [15] Electrophysiological Differences in the Processing of Affect Misattribution
    Hashimoto, Yohei
    Minami, Tetsuto
    Nakauchi, Shigeki
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (11):
  • [16] Individual Differences in Language Processing: Phonology
    Yu, Alan C. L.
    Zellou, Georgia
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF LINGUISTICS, VOL 5, 2019, 5 : 131 - 150
  • [17] An examination of individual differences in levels of processing
    Unsworth, Nash
    Miller, Ashley L.
    MEMORY, 2024, 32 (05) : 615 - 626
  • [18] Individual differences in face identity processing
    McCaffery, Jennifer M.
    Robertson, David J.
    Young, Andrew W.
    Burton, A. Mike
    COGNITIVE RESEARCH-PRINCIPLES AND IMPLICATIONS, 2018, 3
  • [19] Individual differences in face identity processing
    Jennifer M. McCaffery
    David J. Robertson
    Andrew W. Young
    A. Mike Burton
    Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3
  • [20] Sex differences in face recognition and influence of facial affect
    Hofmann, Stefan G.
    Suvak, Michael
    Litz, Brett T.
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2006, 40 (08) : 1683 - 1690