Feedback timing modulates interactions between feedback processing and memory encoding: Evidence from event-related potentials

被引:0
作者
Gerrit Höltje
Axel Mecklinger
机构
[1] Campus A2.4,Experimental Neuropsychology Unit, Department of Psychology
[2] Saarland University,undefined
来源
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience | 2020年 / 20卷
关键词
Event-related potentials; Reinforcement learning; Reward prediction error; Feedback timing; Declarative memory;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Feedback-based learning relies on a procedural learning system driven by reward prediction errors (RPEs). The processing of temporally delayed feedback is supported by brain structures associated with declarative memory processes, but it is still unknown how delayed feedback processing and memory encoding interact. In this study, a subsequent memory paradigm was employed to investigate how the incidental encoding of feedback pictures presented with a short (SD, 500 ms) or long (LD, 6500 ms) delay in a probabilistic learning task affects the event-related potential (ERP) correlate of RPEs (i.e., the feedback-related negativity; FRN). In an ensuing test phase, a surprise recognition memory test for the feedback pictures was conducted. FRN amplitudes measured in the feedback-locked ERPs recorded during the learning phase (FRNpeak) and in the negative minus positive feedback difference wave (FRNdiff) were compared for subsequently remembered and forgotten feedback pictures. Feedback processing as reflected in the FRNpeak was diminished for remembered LD feedback pictures, indicating that delayed feedback processing and memory encoding competed for similar neural processing resources. As evidenced by large FRNdiff amplitudes in the SD condition, the evaluation of shortly delayed feedback strongly relied on the procedural learning system. A complementary model-based single trial analysis was conducted to validate models of the functional significance of the FRN. Consistent with previous studies, feedback-locked N170 and P300 amplitudes were sensitive to feedback delay. In the test phase, memory for LD feedback pictures was better than for SD pictures and accompanied by a late old–new effect, presumably reflecting extended recollective processing.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 264
页数:14
相关论文
共 138 条
[1]  
Arbel Y(2013)The good, the bad, or the useful? The examination of the relationship between the feedback-related negativity (FRN) and long-term learning outcomes Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 25 1249-1260
[2]  
Goforth K(2017)It’s all about timing: An electrophysiological examination of feedback-based learning with immediate and delayed feedback Neuropsychologia 99 179-186
[3]  
Donchin E(2014)A single-trial estimation of the feedback-related negativity and its relation to BOLD responses in a time-estimation task Journal of Neuroscience 34 3005-3012
[4]  
Arbel Y(2015)Peri-encoding predictors of memory encoding and consolidation Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 50 128-142
[5]  
Hong L(2006)The computational neurobiology of learning and reward Current Opinion in Neurobiology 16 199-204
[6]  
Baker TE(2012)Reward-related learning via multiple memory systems Biological Psychiatry 72 134-141
[7]  
Holroyd CB(2004)EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis Journal of Neuroscience Methods 134 9-21
[8]  
Becker MPI(2015)Contributions of the hippocampus to feedback learning Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 15 861-877
[9]  
Nitsch AM(1981)Surprise! … Surprise? Psychophysiology 15 493-513
[10]  
Miltner WHR(1996)Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs Psychological Methods 1 170-177