The Bias of Structures: How Multidivisional Organizations Work in the Public Sector

被引:0
作者
Döhler M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Institut für Politische Wissenschaft, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Schneiderberg 50, Hannover
关键词
Multidivisional organizations; Organization theory; Policy output; Public sector;
D O I
10.1007/s11115-015-0329-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper discusses the unexploited possibilities that organization theory offers for explaining the policy output of public-sector organizations. Although political scientists frequently argue that organization matters, exactly how it matters remains unresolved. To investigate this issue, the concept of the multidivisional organization (M-form) is applied to the public sector. Three dimensions of the M-form are identified for closer inspection: 1) the structure-strategy relationship, 2) the managerial or leadership dimension, and 3) the external-relations dimension. Several empirical examples are used to demonstrate that the M-form exerts an independent impact on policy output. While the M-form allows a single organization to perform multiple functions, it also works against crosscutting policies and is inclined toward clientelism and capture. The use of the M-form concept is beneficial for political science analyses in that it requires paying greater attention to the “internal life” of governmental and public-sector organizations. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 100
页数:17
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Arnold R., Whitford A.B., Organisational dilemmas of the EPA: why structure matters for environmental protection, Environmental Politics, 14, 1, pp. 118-123, (2005)
[2]  
Bauer M., Organisational change, management reform and EU policy-making, Journal of European Public Policy, 15, 5, pp. 627-674, (2008)
[3]  
Beck-Jorgensen T., Hansen H.F., Antonsen M., Melander P., Public organizations, multiple constituencies, and governance, Public Administration, 76, 3, pp. 499-518, (1998)
[4]  
Entwurf eines Gesetzes über die integrierte Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht, Drucksache 14/7033, (2001)
[5]  
Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Modernisierung der Aufsichtsstruktur der Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht, Drucksache 16/7078, (2007)
[6]  
Burton R.M., Obel B., Organizational diagnosis and design: Developing theory for application, (1998)
[7]  
Busch A., Shock-absorbers under stress: parapublic institutions and the double challenges of German unification and European integration, Governance in contemporary Germany. The semi-sovereign state revisited, pp. 94-114, (2005)
[8]  
Chandler A., Strategy and structure: chapters in the history of American enterprise, (1962)
[9]  
Chang K.H., de Figueiredo R.J.P., Weingast B.R., Rational choice theories of bureaucratic control and performance, The Elgar companion to public choice, pp. 271-292, (2001)
[10]  
Christensen T., Laegreid P., Roness P.G., Rovik K.A., Organization theory and the public sector: Instrument, culture and myth, (2007)