Precautionary Principle and Robustness for a Stock Pollutant with Multiplicative Risk

被引:0
作者
Fidel Gonzalez
机构
[1] Sam Houston State University,Department of Economics and International Business
来源
Environmental and Resource Economics | 2008年 / 41卷
关键词
Global warming; Knightian uncertainty; Multiplicative disturbances; Pollution control; Precautionary principle; Robustness; Stochastic control; C61; E61; H21; Q28;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The interest shown by policy makers and economists in the precautionary principle indicates the importance of model uncertainty in global warming policy. I show that through robust control, policy makers can implement the precautionary principle to regulate a stock pollutant, and I analyze its effect on expected steady state pollution taxes, stocks and welfare. The paper is broadly comprised of a theoretical part and an application to global warming policy. I find that: (1) an increase in either uncertainty about the model or risk about abatement cost increases expected steady state pollution taxes; (2) a robust policy is preferred for any level of model uncertainty and this preference increases for either higher model uncertainty or higher multiplicative risk and (3) the effect on expected steady state pollution taxes and stock of introducing model uncertainty is relatively small for high levels of model uncertainty. These results advocate using robust policies for a stock pollutant in the presence of model uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 46
页数:21
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Amman H(1997)Numerical solution methods of the Algebraic Matrix Riccati Equations J Econ Dynamics Control 21 363-369
[2]  
Neudecker H(1974)Environmental preservation, uncertainty and irreversibility Quart J Econ 88 312-319
[3]  
Arrow K(2006)On precautionary policies Manage Sci 52 1145-1154
[4]  
Fisher A(1989)Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior J Math Econ 18 141-153
[5]  
Barrieu P(2001)Precautionary principle: the economic perspective Econ Policy 75 302-327
[6]  
Sinclair-Desgagné B(2000)Scientific progress and irreversibility: an economic interpretation of the precautionary principle J Public Econ 75 229-253
[7]  
Gilboa I(2005)Robust control: a note on the response of the control to changes in the free parameter Econ Lett 89 294-299
[8]  
Schmeidler D(2001)Acknowledging misspecification in Macroeconomic Theory Rev Econ Dynamics 4 519-535
[9]  
Gollier C(2001)Robust control and model uncertainty Am Econ Rev 91 60-66
[10]  
Gollier C(1974)Investment decisions under irreversibility: the irreversibility effect Am Econ Rev 64 1006-1012