U.S. Medical Examiner/Coroner capability to handle highly infectious decedents

被引:0
作者
Aurora B. Le
Erin G. Brooks
Lily A. McNulty
James R. Gill
Jocelyn J. Herstein
Janelle Rios
Scott J. Patlovich
Katelyn C. Jelden
Kendra K. Schmid
John J. Lowe
Shawn G. Gibbs
机构
[1] Indiana University School of Public Health,Department of Environmental and Occupational Health
[2] Indiana University School of Public Health,Department of Applied Health Science
[3] University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
[4] National Association of Medical Examiners (NAME) Ad Hoc Committee for Bioterrorism and Infectious Disease,Department of Pathology
[5] Yale School of Medicine,Department of Environmental, Agricultural & Occupational Health, College of Public Health
[6] University of Nebraska Medical Center,Global Center for Health Security
[7] University of Nebraska Medical Center,School of Public Health
[8] The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth),Office of Safety, Health, Environment and Risk Management
[9] The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth),College of Medicine
[10] University of Nebraska Medical Center,Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health
[11] University of Nebraska Medical Center,undefined
[12] Nebraska Biocontainment Unit,undefined
来源
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology | 2019年 / 15卷
关键词
Coroners; Medical examiners; Highly infectious diseases; Autopsy; Personal protective equipment; Forensic pathology;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the United States of America, Medical Examiners and Coroners (ME/Cs) investigate approximately 20% of all deaths. Unexpected deaths, such as those occurring due to a deceased person under investigation for a highly infectious disease, are likely to fall under ME/C jurisdiction, thereby placing the ME/C and other morgue personnel at increased risk of contracting an occupationally acquired infection. This survey of U.S. ME/Cs′ capabilities to address highly infectious decedents aimed to determine opportunities for improvement at ME/C facilities serving a state or metropolitan area. Data for this study was gathered via an electronic survey. Of the 177 electronic surveys that were distributed, the overall response rate was N = 108 (61%), with 99 of those 108 respondents completing all the questions within the survey. At least one ME/C responded from 47 of 50 states, and the District of Columbia. Select results were: less than half of respondents (44%) stated that their office had been involved in handling a suspected or confirmed highly infectious remains case and responses indicated medical examiners. Additionally, ME/C altered their personal protective equipment based on suspected versus confirmed highly infectious remains rather than taking an all-hazards approach. Standard operating procedures or guidelines should be updated to take an all-hazards approach, best-practices on handling highly infectious remains could be integrated into a standardized education, and evidence-based information on appropriate personal protective equipment selection could be incorporated into a widely disseminated learning module for addressing suspected or confirmed highly infectious remains, as those areas were revealed to be currently lacking.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 40
页数:9
相关论文
共 172 条
[1]  
Brouqui P(2009)Infection control in the management of highly pathogenic infectious diseases: consensus of the European network of infectious disease Lancet Infect Dis 9 301-311
[2]  
Puro V(2014)Clinical care of two patients with Ebola virus disease in the United States N Engl J Med 371 2402-2409
[3]  
Fusco FM(2014)Ebola virus disease cluster in the United States--Dallas County, Texas, 2014 MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 63 1087-1088
[4]  
Bannister B(2015)Ebola virus disease: preparedness and infection control lessons learned from two biocontainment units Curr Opin Infect Dis 28 343-348
[5]  
Schilling S(2015)Caring for patients with Ebola: a challenge in any care facility Ann Intern Med 162 68-69
[6]  
Follin P(2015)Lessons learned: critical care management of patients with Ebola in the United States Crit Care Med 43 1157-1164
[7]  
Lyon GM(2015)Reflections on interprofessional team-based clinical care in the ebola epidemic: the Nebraska medicine experience Nurs Outlook 63 27-29
[8]  
Mehta AK(2016)Current capabilities and capacity of ebola treatment centers in the United States Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 37 313-318
[9]  
Varkey JB(2014)Safe management of patients with serious communicable diseases: recent experience with Ebola virus Ann Intern Med 161 829-830
[10]  
Brantly K(2016)Clinical management of Ebola virus disease in the United States and Europe N Engl J Med 374 636-646