Gender and individual differences in cueing effects: Visuospatial attention and object likability

被引:0
作者
Takashi Mitsuda
Mio Otani
Sayana Sugimoto
机构
[1] Ritsumeikan University,College of Information Science and Engineering
来源
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics | 2019年 / 81卷
关键词
Attention; Preference; Gender differences; Cueing; Unconsciousness;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
An arrow marker appearing in a field of view shifts the observer’s attention in its indicated direction. On the other hand, the gaze of another individual not only shifts the observer’s attention but also increases the likability of objects in the direction of their gaze. These effects occur even when the arrow markers or gaze cues are presented for very short periods so that the observer is unaware of them. To expand on the findings of previous studies, we conducted two experiments. In the first we examined the changes in likability and attentional shift induced by supraliminal and subliminal arrow markers, using 40 male and 40 female participants. We found, contrary to previous findings, that supraliminal arrow markers not only shifted the observers’ attention but slightly increased object likability. On the other hand, subliminal arrow markers only shifted the observers’ attention. The attentional shift was stronger for female than for male participants in the case of supraliminal, but not of subliminal, markers. The second experiment verified the changes in likability induced by supraliminal arrow markers and compared the effects with those of supraliminal gaze cues among 40 female participants. We found that the liking effect was observed for both arrow markers and gaze cues. However, both effects were small, and no significant difference was found between them. Overall, these results show that gender and individual differences have considerable impacts on cueing effects.
引用
收藏
页码:1890 / 1900
页数:10
相关论文
共 113 条
[1]  
Alwall N(2010)The gender difference in gaze-cueing: Associations with empathizing and systemizing Personality and Individual Differences 49 729-732
[2]  
Johansson D(2005)Sex differences in eye gaze and symbolic cueing of attention Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 631-650
[3]  
Hansen S(2007)Affective evaluations of objects are influenced by observed gaze direction and emotional expression Cognition 104 644-653
[4]  
Bayliss AP(2006)Gaze cuing and affective judgments of objects: I like what you look at Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13 1061-1066
[5]  
di Pellegrino G(2010)Gaze cueing elicited by emotional faces is influenced by affective context Visual Cognition 18 1214-1232
[6]  
Tipper SP(2010)The effectiveness of a gaze cue depends on the facial expression of emotion: Evidence from simultaneous competing cues Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72 1814-1824
[7]  
Bayliss AP(1989)Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987 Psychological Bulletin 106 265-289
[8]  
Frischen A(2017)Drawn towards what others seem to like: Implicit preference for objects and people looked at with a Duchenne smile Motivation and Emotion 41 628-635
[9]  
Fenske MJ(2017)Spatial orienting of attention to social cues is modulated by cue type and gender of viewer Experimental Brain Research 235 1481-1490
[10]  
Tipper SP(2007)Familiarity accentuates gaze cuing in women but not men Biology Letters 3 64-67