A meta-ethnography to understand the experience of living with urinary incontinence: ‘is it just part and parcel of life?’

被引:0
作者
Francine Toye
Karen L. Barker
机构
[1] Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust,Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre
[2] University of Oxford,Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS)
来源
BMC Urology | / 20卷
关键词
Incontinence; Qualitative research; Qualitative evidence synthesis; Meta-ethnography;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 588 条
  • [21] Barker K(2006)Developing optimal search strategies for retrieving qualitative studies in PsycINFO Eval Health Prof. 29 440-e205
  • [22] Toye F(2006)Hedges team. Developing optimal search strategies for retrieving clinically relevant qualitative studies in EMBASE Qual Health Res. 16 162-47
  • [23] Seers K(2011)Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research Health Technol Assess. 15 1-70
  • [24] Allcock N(2017)A qualitative evidence synthesis to explore healthcare professionals’ experience of prescribing opioids to adults with chronic non-malignant pain BMC Fam Pract. 18 94-6249
  • [25] Briggs M(2006)‘Brimful of STARLITE’: toward standards for reporting literature searches J Med Libr Assoc. 94 421-110
  • [26] Carr E(2007)Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods J Health ServRes Policy. 12 42-772
  • [27] Barker K(2013)'Trying to pin down jelly' - exploring intuitive processes in quality assessment for meta-ethnography BMC Med Res Methodol. 13 46-216
  • [28] Toye F(2016)Using Qualitative Evidence in Decision Making for Health and Social Interventions: An Approach to Assess Confidence in Findings from Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (GRADE-CERQual) PLOS Med. 12 e1001895-1286
  • [29] Seers K(2018)Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings–paper 6: how to assess relevance of the data Implement Sci. 13 4-213
  • [30] Allcock N(2018)Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 3: how to assess methodological limitations Implement Sci. 13 9-339