A Call for, and Beginner’s Guide to, Measurement Invariance Testing in Evolutionary Psychology

被引:58
作者
Wang S. [1 ]
Chen C.-C. [2 ]
Dai C.-L. [2 ]
Richardson G.B. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
[2] University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV
[3] School of Human Services, College of Education, Criminal Justice, and Human Services [460R Teachers-Dyer Complex], Cincinnati, OH
关键词
Differential item function; Evolutionary psychology; Item response theory; Measurement invariance; Multiple groups confirmatory factor analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s40806-017-0125-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Measurement invariance is a statistical property of an instrument (e.g., a test or questionnaire) indicating that it measures the same construct(s) in the same way across subgroups of respondents. Given the extensive research in evolutionary psychology devoted to sex differences and cross-cultural comparisons, measurement invariance testing is crucial not only because it protects against erroneous inference, but also because it provides nuanced information about group similarities and differences. In this article, we draw attention to the importance of, and present a beginner’s guide to, measurement invariance testing. We define measurement invariance formally, summarize sources of non-invariance and the rationale for measurement invariance testing, and describe the two frameworks typically used to test for invariance. We then review evidence of a relative lack of measurement invariance testing in evolutionary psychology and conclude with a case example with MPlus syntax. By testing for measurement invariance, researchers studying evolutionary psychology can strengthen their field and enhance the popularity of their constructs in other disciplines. © 2017, Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 178
页数:12
相关论文
共 100 条
[41]  
Gesthuizen M., Scheepers P., van der Veld W., Volker B., Structural aspects of social capital: tests for cross-national equivalence in Europe, Quality & Quantity, 47, 2, pp. 909-922, (2013)
[42]  
Harding J., Qualitative data analysis from start to finish, (2013)
[43]  
Hader S., Gabler S., Sampling and estimation, Cross-cultural survey methods, pp. 117-134, (2003)
[44]  
Heeringa S.G., O'Muircheartaigh C., Sampling designs for cross-cultural and cross-national survey programs, Survey methods in multinational, multiregional, and multicultural contexts, pp. 251-268, (2010)
[45]  
Horn J.L., McArdle J.J., A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research, Experimental Aging Research, 18, 3, pp. 117-144, (1992)
[46]  
Horn J.L., McArdle J.J., Mason R., When is invariance not invarient: A practical scientist's look at the ethereal concept of factor invariance, Southern Psychologist, 1, 4, pp. 179-189, (1983)
[47]  
Hu L.T., Bentler P.M., Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1, pp. 1-55, (1999)
[48]  
Joreskog K.G., Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations, Psychometrika, 36, 4, pp. 409-426, (1971)
[49]  
Jackson J.J., Kirkpatrick L.A., The structure and measurement of human mating strategies: toward a multidimensional model of sociosexuality, Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 6, pp. 382-391, (2007)
[50]  
Johnson T.P., Approaches to equivalence in cross-cultural and cross-national survey research, ZUMA-Nachrichten Spezial, 3, pp. 1-40, (1998)