A Call for, and Beginner’s Guide to, Measurement Invariance Testing in Evolutionary Psychology

被引:58
作者
Wang S. [1 ]
Chen C.-C. [2 ]
Dai C.-L. [2 ]
Richardson G.B. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
[2] University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV
[3] School of Human Services, College of Education, Criminal Justice, and Human Services [460R Teachers-Dyer Complex], Cincinnati, OH
关键词
Differential item function; Evolutionary psychology; Item response theory; Measurement invariance; Multiple groups confirmatory factor analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s40806-017-0125-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Measurement invariance is a statistical property of an instrument (e.g., a test or questionnaire) indicating that it measures the same construct(s) in the same way across subgroups of respondents. Given the extensive research in evolutionary psychology devoted to sex differences and cross-cultural comparisons, measurement invariance testing is crucial not only because it protects against erroneous inference, but also because it provides nuanced information about group similarities and differences. In this article, we draw attention to the importance of, and present a beginner’s guide to, measurement invariance testing. We define measurement invariance formally, summarize sources of non-invariance and the rationale for measurement invariance testing, and describe the two frameworks typically used to test for invariance. We then review evidence of a relative lack of measurement invariance testing in evolutionary psychology and conclude with a case example with MPlus syntax. By testing for measurement invariance, researchers studying evolutionary psychology can strengthen their field and enhance the popularity of their constructs in other disciplines. © 2017, Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 178
页数:12
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]  
Allum N., Read S., Sturgis P., Evaluating change in social and political trust in Europe, Cross-Cultural Research: Methods and Applications, 2, pp. 35-53, (2011)
[2]  
Ashton M.C., Lee K., Problems with the method of correlated vectors, Intelligence, 33, 4, pp. 431-444, (2005)
[3]  
Atari M., Assessment of long-term mate preferences in Iran, Evolutionary Psychology, 15, 2, pp. 1-17, (2017)
[4]  
Avery D.R., Tonidandel S., Thomas K.M., Johnson C.D., Mack D.A., Assessing the multigroup ethnic identity measure for measurement equivalence across racial and ethnic groups, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 5, pp. 877-888, (2007)
[5]  
Billiet J., Koch A., Philippens M., Understanding and improving response rates, Measuring attitudes cross-nationally: lessons from the European Social Survey, pp. 113-138, (2007)
[6]  
Black C.J., Figueredo A.J., Jacobs W.J., Substance, history, and politics: an examination of the conceptual underpinnings of alternative approaches to the life history narrative, Evolutionary Psychology, 15, 1, (2017)
[7]  
Boeve-de Pauw J., Jacobs K., Van Petegem P., Gender differences in environmental values: an issue of measurement?, Environment and Behavior, 46, 3, pp. 373-397, (2014)
[8]  
Bollen K.A., Structural equations with latent variables, (1989)
[9]  
Borsboom D., Psychometric perspectives on diagnostic systems, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64, 9, pp. 1089-1108, (2008)
[10]  
Braun M., Behr D., Kaczmirek L., Assessing cross-national equivalence of measures of xenophobia: evidence from probing in web surveys, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25, 3, pp. 383-395, (2013)