Examining Early Childhood Health Outcomes of Children Born Late Preterm in Urban Manitoba

被引:0
作者
Leah K. Crockett
Marni D. Brownell
Maureen I. Heaman
Chelsea A. Ruth
Heather J. Prior
机构
[1] George and Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation,Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences
[2] University of Manitoba,College of Nursing, Max Rady Faculty of Health Sciences
[3] University of Manitoba,Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences
[4] University of Manitoba,undefined
来源
Maternal and Child Health Journal | 2017年 / 21卷
关键词
Late preterm; Early childhood development; Respiratory health; Health care utilization; Socioeconomic status;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective The late preterm population [34–36 weeks gestational age (GA)] is known to incur increased morbidity in the infancy stage compared to the population born at term (39–41 weeks GA). This study aimed to examine the health of these children during their early childhood years, with specific attention to the role of socioeconomic status. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, including all live-born children born at 34–36 and 39–41 weeks GA in urban Manitoba between 2000 and 2005 (n = 28,100). Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association of GA with early childhood morbidity after controlling for maternal, child and family level variables. Results The late preterm population was found to have significantly greater adjusted odds of lower respiratory tract infections in the preschool years (aOR = 1.59 [1.24, 2.04]) and asthma at school age (aOR = 1.33 [1.18, 1.47]) compared to the population born at term. The groups also differed in health care utilization at ages 4 (aOR = 1.19 [1.06,1.34]) and 7 years (aOR = 1.24 [1.09, 1.42]). Additional variables associated with poor outcomes suggest that social deprivation and GA simultaneously have a negative impact on early childhood development. Conclusions for Practice Adjustment for predictors of poor early childhood development, including socioeconomic status, were found to attenuate but not eliminate health differences between children born late preterm and children born at term. Poorer health outcomes that extend into childhood have implications for practice at the population level and suggest a need for further follow-up post discharge.
引用
收藏
页码:2141 / 2148
页数:7
相关论文
共 93 条
  • [1] Abe K(2010)Late preterm birth and risk of developing asthma The Journal of Pediatrics 157 74-78
  • [2] Shapiro-Mendoza CK(2014)Global burden of asthma among children The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 18 1269-1278
  • [3] Hall LR(2008)Adverse neonatal outcomes: Examining the risks between preterm, late preterm and term infants American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 199 e1-e8
  • [4] Satten GA(2012)Effects of gestational age at birth on health outcomes at 3 and 5 years of age: Population based cohort study BMJ 344 e869-15
  • [5] Asher I(2010)Developmental physiology: Lung function during growth and development from birth to old age European Respiratory Monograph 47 1-457
  • [6] Pearce N(2014)School performance at age 7 years in late preterm and early term birth: A cohort study Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 99 F451-1401
  • [7] Bastek J(2007)Late-preterm infants: A population at risk Pediatrics 126 1390-341
  • [8] Sammel M(2008)Late preterm infants, early term infants, and timing of elective deliveries Clinics in Perinatology 35 325-33
  • [9] Pare E(2006)Short-term outcomes of infants born at 35 and 36 weeks gestation: We need to ask more questions Seminars in Perinatology 114 28-e838
  • [10] Srinicas S(2011)Association of late-preterm birth with asthma in young children: Practice-based study Pediatrics 128 e830-299