Preferences for Injectable PrEP Among Young U.S. Cisgender Men and Transgender Women and Men Who Have Sex with Men

被引:0
作者
Katie B. Biello
Sybil Hosek
Morgan T. Drucker
Marvin Belzer
Matthew J. Mimiaga
Elliot Marrow
Julia Coffey-Esquivel
Jennifer Brothers
Kenneth H. Mayer
机构
[1] Brown University School of Public Health,Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences
[2] Brown University School of Public Health,Department of Epidemiology
[3] The Fenway Institute,Center for Health Equity Research
[4] Fenway Health,Department of Psychiatry
[5] Brown University,Division of Adolescent Medicine
[6] Stroger Hospital of Cook County,Division of Infectious Diseases
[7] Children’s Hospital Los Angeles,Global Health and Population
[8] Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center,undefined
[9] Harvard Medical School,undefined
[10] Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health,undefined
来源
Archives of Sexual Behavior | 2018年 / 47卷
关键词
HIV prevention; Pre-exposure prophylaxis; Men who have sex with men; Transgender; Sexual orientation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Young men who have sex with men account for approximately 20% of incident HIV infections in the U.S. Antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) administered as a daily pill has been shown to decrease HIV acquisition in at-risk individuals. New modalities for PrEP are being developed and tested, including injectable PrEP; however, acceptability of these emerging modalities has not yet been examined in youth. We conducted six focus groups with 36 young men and transgender men and women who have sex with men in Boston, Chicago, and Los Angeles in 2016 to assess interest in and preference for different PrEP modalities. Youth were purposively recruited based on diversity of age, race/ethnicity, and prior PrEP experience. Data were coded using content coding based on key domains of the interview guide, in particular around the central themes of interest in and barriers and facilitators to injectable PrEP use. Participants were knowledgeable about oral PrEP but suggested barriers to broader uptake, including stigma, marginalization, and access to information. While participants were split on preference for injectable versus oral PrEP, they agreed quarterly injections may be more manageable and better for those who have adherence difficulties and for those who engage in sex more frequently. Concerns specific to injectable PrEP included: severity/duration of side effects, pain, level of protection prior to next injection, distrust of medical system and injections, and cost. Understanding barriers to and preferences for diverse prevention modalities will allow for more HIV prevention options, improved products, and better interventions, thus allowing individuals to make informed HIV prevention choices.
引用
收藏
页码:2101 / 2107
页数:6
相关论文
共 238 条
[51]  
Kallas EG(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[52]  
Schechter M(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[53]  
Guanira J(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[54]  
Bushman L(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[55]  
Burns DN(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[56]  
Rooney JF(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[57]  
Glidden DV(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[58]  
Grant RM(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[59]  
Lama JR(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[60]  
Anderson PL(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined