Preferences for Injectable PrEP Among Young U.S. Cisgender Men and Transgender Women and Men Who Have Sex with Men

被引:0
作者
Katie B. Biello
Sybil Hosek
Morgan T. Drucker
Marvin Belzer
Matthew J. Mimiaga
Elliot Marrow
Julia Coffey-Esquivel
Jennifer Brothers
Kenneth H. Mayer
机构
[1] Brown University School of Public Health,Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences
[2] Brown University School of Public Health,Department of Epidemiology
[3] The Fenway Institute,Center for Health Equity Research
[4] Fenway Health,Department of Psychiatry
[5] Brown University,Division of Adolescent Medicine
[6] Stroger Hospital of Cook County,Division of Infectious Diseases
[7] Children’s Hospital Los Angeles,Global Health and Population
[8] Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center,undefined
[9] Harvard Medical School,undefined
[10] Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health,undefined
来源
Archives of Sexual Behavior | 2018年 / 47卷
关键词
HIV prevention; Pre-exposure prophylaxis; Men who have sex with men; Transgender; Sexual orientation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Young men who have sex with men account for approximately 20% of incident HIV infections in the U.S. Antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) administered as a daily pill has been shown to decrease HIV acquisition in at-risk individuals. New modalities for PrEP are being developed and tested, including injectable PrEP; however, acceptability of these emerging modalities has not yet been examined in youth. We conducted six focus groups with 36 young men and transgender men and women who have sex with men in Boston, Chicago, and Los Angeles in 2016 to assess interest in and preference for different PrEP modalities. Youth were purposively recruited based on diversity of age, race/ethnicity, and prior PrEP experience. Data were coded using content coding based on key domains of the interview guide, in particular around the central themes of interest in and barriers and facilitators to injectable PrEP use. Participants were knowledgeable about oral PrEP but suggested barriers to broader uptake, including stigma, marginalization, and access to information. While participants were split on preference for injectable versus oral PrEP, they agreed quarterly injections may be more manageable and better for those who have adherence difficulties and for those who engage in sex more frequently. Concerns specific to injectable PrEP included: severity/duration of side effects, pain, level of protection prior to next injection, distrust of medical system and injections, and cost. Understanding barriers to and preferences for diverse prevention modalities will allow for more HIV prevention options, improved products, and better interventions, thus allowing individuals to make informed HIV prevention choices.
引用
收藏
页码:2101 / 2107
页数:6
相关论文
共 238 条
[1]  
Bogart LM(2005)Are HIV/AIDS conspiracy beliefs a barrier to HIV prevention among African Americans? Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 38 213-218
[2]  
Thorburn S(2015)PrEP implementation: Moving from trials to policy and practice Journal of the International AIDS Society 18 20222-20
[3]  
Cáceres CF(2011)What about N? A methodological study of sample-size reporting in focus group studies BMC Medical Research Methodology 11 26-155
[4]  
O’Reilly KR(2007)Health disparities and prevention: Racial/ethnic barriers to flu vaccinations Journal of Community Health 32 5-2222
[5]  
Mayer KH(2011)Developing and using a codebook for the analysis of interview data: An example from a professional development research project Field Methods 23 136-1778
[6]  
Baggaley R(2011)Challenging assumptions about minority participation in US clinical research American Journal of Public Health 101 2217-254
[7]  
Carlsen B(2017)Critical race theory as a tool for understanding poor engagement along the HIV care continuum among African American/Black and Hispanic persons living with HIV in the United States: A qualitative exploration International Journal for Equity in Health 16 54-829
[8]  
Glenton C(1997)Under the shadow of Tuskegee: African Americans and health care American Journal of Public Health 87 1773-2599
[9]  
Chen JY(2013)From efficacy to effectiveness: Facilitators and barriers to PrEP acceptability and motivations for adherence among MSM and transgender women in New York City AIDS Patient Care and STDs 27 248-82
[10]  
Fox SA(2014)Women or LARC first? Reproductive autonomy and the promotion of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 46 171-271