The coping flexibility questionnaire: development and initial validation in patients with chronic rheumatic diseases

被引:0
作者
Johanna E. Vriezekolk
Wim G. J. M. van Lankveld
Agnes M. M. Eijsbouts
Toon van Helmond
Rinie Geenen
Cornelia H. M. van den Ende
机构
[1] Sint Maartenskliniek,Department of Rheumatology
[2] Utrecht University,Department of Clinical and Health Psychology
来源
Rheumatology International | 2012年 / 32卷
关键词
Coping flexibility; Rheumatic diseases; Psychometric properties; Psychological adjustment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Coping flexibility may be beneficial for the adjustment in the context of a progressive and unpredictable course of chronic rheumatic diseases. The aim of this study was to develop and initially validate a self-report measure that assesses coping flexibility. Study participants were 147 outpatients with chronic rheumatic diseases (73% women, mean age 59 (range 20–79) years). Principal axis factoring analysis with oblique rotation was applied and internal consistency was determined. To investigate the initial validity of the coping flexibility questionnaire (COFLEX), hypothesised correlations with psychological and physical adjustment outcomes, pain, and coping strategies were examined. Factor analysis yielded a two-factor model of coping flexibility with acceptable internal consistency: versatility, the capability of switching between assimilative and accommodative coping strategies according to personal goals and situational demands (α = .88) and reflective coping, the capability of generating and considering coping options, and appraising the suitability of a coping strategy in a given situation (α = .70). Versatility was correlated with adaptive ways of coping and psychological adjustment, but not with physical adjustment and pain. Reflective coping was correlated with both adaptive and maladaptive ways of coping, but it was not correlated with adjustment outcomes. In conclusion, the current study suggests acceptable internal consistency of the COFLEX. Preliminary evidence of the validity of the versatility dimension is indicated, while the validity of reflective coping could not be firmly established. The associations of versatility with favourable adjustment to the disease warrant future confirmatory and validity research in larger samples of patients with chronic rheumatic diseases.
引用
收藏
页码:2383 / 2391
页数:8
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
Folkman S(2004)Coping: pitfalls and promise Annu Rev Psychol 55 745-774
[2]  
Moskowitz JT(2004)The importance of being flexible: the ability to both enhance and suppress emotional expression predicts long-term adjustment Psychol Sci 15 482-487
[3]  
Bonanno GA(2001)Assessing coping flexibility in real-life and laboratory settings: a multimethod approach J Pers Soc Psychol 80 814-833
[4]  
Papa A(1994)Measuring coping flexibility Psychol Health 9 409-424
[5]  
Lalande K(1996)Coping with chronic pain: flexible goal adjustment as an interactive buffer against pain-related distress Pain 67 41-51
[6]  
Westphal M(1990)Tenacious goal pursuit and flexible goal adjustment: explication and age-related analysis of assimilative and accommodative strategies of coping Psychol Aging 5 58-67
[7]  
Coifman K(1993)Coping theory and research: past, present, and future Psychosom Med 55 234-247
[8]  
Cheng C(2007)Health psychology: psychological adjustment to chronic disease Ann Rev Psychol 58 565-592
[9]  
Lester N(1999)Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research Psychol Methods 4 272-299
[10]  
Smart L(2007)Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires J Clin Epidemiol 60 34-42