A Survey on Surrogate Approaches to Non-negative Matrix Factorization

被引:3
作者
Fernsel P. [1 ]
Maass P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Center for Industrial Mathematics, University of Bremen, Bremen
关键词
Imaging mass spectrometry; Majorize-minimization algorithms; Multi-parameter regularization; Non-negative matrix factorization;
D O I
10.1007/s10013-018-0315-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Motivated by applications in hyperspectral imaging, we investigate methods for approximating a high-dimensional non-negative matrix Y by a product of two lower-dimensional, non-negative matrices K and X. This so-called non-negative matrix factorization is based on defining suitable Tikhonov functionals, which combine a discrepancy measure for Y ≈KX with penalty terms for enforcing additional properties of K and X. The minimization is based on alternating minimization with respect to K and X, where in each iteration step one replaces the original Tikhonov functional by a locally defined surrogate functional. The choice of surrogate functionals is crucial: It should allow a comparatively simple minimization and simultaneously its first-order optimality condition should lead to multiplicative update rules, which automatically preserve non-negativity of the iterates. We review the most standard construction principles for surrogate functionals for Frobenius-norm and Kullback–Leibler discrepancy measures. We extend the known surrogate constructions by a general framework, which allows to add a large variety of penalty terms. The paper finishes by deriving the corresponding alternating minimization schemes explicitly and by applying these methods to MALDI imaging data. © 2018, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:987 / 1021
页数:34
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Aebersold R., Goodlett D.R., Mass spectrometry in proteomics, Chem. Rev., 101, pp. 269-296, (2001)
[2]  
Alexandrov T., Bartels A., Testing for presence of known and unknown molecules in imaging mass spectrometry, Bioinformatics, 29, pp. 2335-2342, (2013)
[3]  
Alexandrov T., Becker M., Deininger S.-O., Ernst G., Wehder L., Grasmair M., von Eggeling F., Thiele H., Maass P., Spatial segmentation of imaging mass spectrometry data with edge-preserving image denoising and clustering, J. Proteome Res., 9, pp. 6535-6546, (2010)
[4]  
Bishop C., Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, (2006)
[5]  
Bohning D., Lindsay B.G., Monotonicity of quadratic-approximation algorithms, Ann. Inst. Stat. Math., 40, pp. 641-663, (1988)
[6]  
Caprioli R.M., Farmer T.B., Gile J., Molecular imaging of biological samples: localization of peptides and proteins using MALDI-TOF MS, Anal. Chem., 69, pp. 4751-4760, (1997)
[7]  
Chambolle A., Caselles V., Cremers D., Novaga M., Cremers D., Pock T., An introduction to total variation for image analysis, Theoretical Foundations and Numerical Methods for Sparse Recovery. Radon Series on Computational and Applied Mathematics, 9, pp. 263-340, (2010)
[8]  
Chan T., Esedoglu S., Park F., Yip A., Total variation image restoration: Overview and recent developments, Handbook of Mathematical Models in Computer Vision, pp. 17-31, (2006)
[9]  
Condat L., Discrete total variation: New definition and minimization, SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 10, pp. 1258-1290, (2017)
[10]  
Cvetkovski Z., Inequalities - Theorems, Techniques and Selected Problems, (2012)