Strategic top-down control versus attentional bias by previous reward history

被引:0
作者
Jennifer Lynn
Myoungju Shin
机构
[1] Charles Sturt University,School of Psychology
来源
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics | 2015年 / 77卷
关键词
Attentional capture; Attention; Reward history; Motivation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Rewards modify performance so that attentional priority is given to stimuli associated with a higher probability of reward. A stimulus associated with reward attracts attention even when it is no longer relevant. In this study, we explored whether or not strategic top-down control can be employed to overcome the attentional bias from a recent reward–stimulus association. Four groups of 12 participants completed a spatial-cueing task involving two phases, in which the cue associated with the target location changed from Phase 1 to Phase 2. Attentional-bias effects toward a previously rewarded cue were demonstrated when the rewarded cue from Phase 1 interfered with the orienting toward a nonrewarded but valid cue in Phase 2. Associating the Phase 2 cue with a higher reward than had been used in Phase 1 resulted in a rapid orientation of attention to the new cue. These findings suggest that pathologies characterized by maladaptive attentional biases (e.g., addiction) may be counteracted by treatments that manipulate motivation by enhancing the subjective relevance of rewards that are less harmful.
引用
收藏
页码:2207 / 2216
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Top-down-driven grouping overrules the central attentional bias
    Linnell, Karina J.
    Humphreys, Glyn W.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2007, 33 (03) : 530 - 548
  • [32] Using response time distributions to examine top-down influences on attentional capture
    Burnham, Bryan R.
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2013, 75 (02) : 257 - 277
  • [33] Top-down attentional processing enhances auditory evoked gamma band activity
    Debener, S
    Herrmann, CS
    Kranczioch, C
    Gembris, D
    Engel, AK
    NEUROREPORT, 2003, 14 (05) : 683 - 686
  • [34] Using response time distributions to examine top-down influences on attentional capture
    Bryan R. Burnham
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2013, 75 : 257 - 277
  • [35] Pupil dilation reveals top-down attentional load during spatial monitoring
    Lisi, Matteo
    Bonato, Mario
    Zorzi, Marco
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 112 : 39 - 45
  • [36] Decline in the integration of top-down and bottom-up attentional control in older adults with mild cognitive impairment
    He, Hao
    Chen, Yiqi
    Li, Xiaoyu
    Hu, Xiaohui
    Wang, Jing
    Wu, Tiantian
    Yang, Dandan
    Guan, Qing
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2021, 161
  • [37] Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: Converging evidence from event-related potentials
    Lien, Mei-Ching
    Ruthruff, Eric
    Goodin, Zachary
    Remington, Roger W.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2008, 34 (03) : 509 - 530
  • [38] A model of top-down gain control in the auditory system
    Schneider, Bruce A.
    Parker, Scott
    Murphy, Dana
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2011, 73 (05) : 1562 - 1578
  • [39] Top-down control: A unified principle of cortical learning
    Makino, Hiroshi
    NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2019, 141 : 23 - 28
  • [40] Top-down control of eye movements: Yarbus revisited
    DeAngelus, Marianne
    Pelz, Jeff B.
    VISUAL COGNITION, 2009, 17 (6-7) : 790 - 811