Single versus multiple adjunctive Er,Cr:YSGG application to scaling and root planing in periodontal maintenance patients with residual periodontal pockets

被引：0
作者：
Watchanasanout N. [1 ]
Teparat-Burana T. [2 ]
机构：
[1] Dental Department, Kalasin Hospital, Kalasin province, Kalasin
[2] Department of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok
来源：
Lasers in Dental Science | 2020年 / 4卷 / 4期
关键词：
Er; Cr:YSGG laser; Residual periodontal pockets; Scaling and root planing; Supportive periodontal therapy;
D O I：
10.1007/s41547-020-00105-8
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical results between single and multiple Er,Cr:YSGG laser applications as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) in periodontal maintenance patients with residual periodontal pockets. Methods: This study was a split-mouth, double-blind, randomized clinical trial with 17 periodontal maintenance patients who presented two single-rooted teeth with probing depth (PD) of 5–9 mm and bleeding on probing (BOP). The teeth were randomly assigned to group A (single Er,Cr:YSGG application + SRP) and group B (multiple Er,Cr:YSGG application + SRP). Presence of plaque, BOP, PD, relative probing attachment level (RPAL), and relative gingival recession (RGR) was evaluated at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment by one calibrated examiner. Results: The results showed no statistically significant differences in PD reduction between groups at 3 months (group A: 1.06 ± 1.09 mm vs. group B: 1.00 ± 1.12 mm) and 6 months (group A: 1.18 ± 1.47 mm vs. group B: 1.00 ± 1.22 mm) compared with the baseline. At 3 months after treatment, the RPAL in group A had a gain (0.65 ± 1.06 mm) while group B was at a loss (0.06 ± 0.83 mm). At 6 months, the RPAL changes between 2 groups showed no statistically significant differences. Only in group B, wherein RGR had a statistically significant increase at 3 months (1.00 ± 0.94 mm) and 6 months (0.71 ± 0.69 mm) after treatment. However, this showed no statistically significant difference when compared with group A. Conclusion: Both single and multiple adjunctive Er,Cr:YSGG applications to SRP in periodontal maintenance patients with residual periodontal pockets demonstrated PD reduction. Only the single laser application group showed clinical attachment level gain, and the multiple application group resulted in an increased gingival recession. However, there are no statistically significant differences between the two treatment modalities in all clinical parameters at 6 months. © 2020, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
引用
收藏
页码：187 / 193
页数：6
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [21] McGuire M.K., Prognosis versus actual outcome: a long-term survey of 100 treated periodontal patients under maintenance care, J Periodontol, 62, 1, pp. 51-58, (1991)
  • [22] (2017)
  • [23] Fischer C., Wennberg A., Fischer R.G., Attstrom R., Clinical evaluation of pulp and dentine sensitivity after supragingival and subgingival scaling, Endod Dent Traumatol, 7, 6, pp. 259-265, (1991)
  • [24] Gholami G.A., Fekrazad R., Esmaiel-Nejad A., Kalhori K.A., An evaluation of the occluding effects of Er
  • [25] Cr:YSGG, Nd:YAG, CO(2) and diode lasers on dentinal tubules: a scanning electron microscope in vitro study, Photomed Laser Surg, 29, 2, pp. 115-121, (2011)
  • [26] Gutknecht N., Betteray C.V., Ozturan S., Vanweersch L., Franzen R., Laser supported reduction of specific microorganisms in the periodontal pocket with the aid of an Er,Cr:YSGG laser: A pilot study, Sci World J, (2015)
  • [27] Ciurescu C., Vanweersch L., Franzen R., Gutknecht N., The antibacterial effect of the combined Er,Cr:YSGG and 940 nm diode laser therapy in treatment of periodontitis: a pilot study, Laser Dent Sci, 2, pp. 43-51, (2018)
  • [28] Ciurescu C.E., Cosgarea R., Ciurescu D., Gheorghiu A., Popa D., Franzen R., Arweiler N.B., Sculean A., Gutknecht N., Adjunctive use of InGaAsP and Er,Cr:YSGG lasers in nonsurgical periodontal therapy: a randomized controlled clinical study, Quintessence Int, 50, 6, pp. 436-447, (2019)
  • [29] Ezzat A., Maden I., Hilgers R.D., Gutknecht N., In vitro study: conventional vs. laser (Er,Cr:YSGG) subgingival scaling and root planing
  • [30] morphologic analysis and efficiency of calculus removal using macroscopic, SEM and laser scanning, Laser Dent Sci, 2, pp. 81-87, (2018)
1234