Ambiguous figures, attention, and perceptual content: reply to Jagnow

被引：0
作者：
Bence Nanay
机构：
[1] University of Antwerp,Centre for Philosophical Psychology
[2] Peterhouse,undefined
[3] University of Cambridge,undefined
来源：
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences | 2011年 / 10卷
关键词：
Attention; Exogenous attention; Endogenous attention; Covert shift of attention; Overt shift of attention;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
I argued in Nanay 2010 that we cannot characterize perceptual content without reference to attention. Here, I defend this account from three objections raised by Jagnow 2011. This mainly takes the form of clarifying some details not sufficiently elaborated in the original article and dispelling some potential misunderstandings.
引用
收藏
页码：557 / 561
页数：4
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Funkhouser E(2006)The determinable-determinate relation Nous 40 548-569
[2]  
Hoffman JE(1995)The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements Perception & Psychophysics 57 787-795
[3]  
Subramaniam B(2011)Ambiguous figures and spatial contents of perceptual experience Philosophy and the Cognitive Sciences 10 325-346
[4]  
Jagnow R(1995)The role of attention in the programming of saccades Vision Research 35 1897-1916
[5]  
Kowler E(2010)Attention and perceptual content Analysis 70 363-370
[6]  
Anderson E(2007)Against intentionalism Philosophical Studies 136 279-304
[7]  
Dosher B(1980)Orienting of attention Quaterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32 2-25
[8]  
Blaser E(1984)Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention Journal of Neuroscience 4 1863-1874
[9]  
Nanay B(1991)Exogenous and endogenous control of attention Attention, Perception and Psychoshysics 49 83-90
[10]  
Nickel B(1998)Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution Nature 396 72-75
12