Changes in medicare reimbursement: Impact on therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia

被引:6
作者
Donnell R.F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Division of Urology, The Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200WestWisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, 53226, WI
关键词
Benign Prostate Hyperplasia; Finasteride; Lower Urinary Tract Symptom; Terazosin; Transurethral Resection;
D O I
10.1007/s11934-002-0049-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Medicare spending accounts for 17% of all health spending and therefore exerts a significant influence on health care spending policies. Medicare policies such as Diagnostic Related Groups and the Resource Based Relative Value System have resulted in profound changes in health care delivery in the United States. These resource-allocation methods are one of the major sources of controversies between managers, doctors, politicians, and social scientists. Financial disincentives associated with these resourceallocation policies have effectively rationed select therapies, particularly transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). As a consequence, TURP, once the second most common surgical procedure billed to Medicare and comprising 38% of major surgical procedures performed by urologists, is increasingly challenged by medical therapy and minimally invasive surgical therapies that may be associated with lower efficacy and durability. This article examines the history of Medicare policies and their influence on TURP. © 2002, Current Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:280 / 284
页数:4
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Weis K.A., Epstein R.S., Huse D.M., Et al., The costs of prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia, Prostate, 22, pp. 234-325, (1993)
[2]  
Young D.W., Saltman R.B., Medical practice, case mix, and cost containment. A new role for the attending physician, JAMA, 247, pp. 801-805, (1982)
[3]  
Munoz E., Regan D.M., Margolis I.B., Wise L., Surgonomics: the identifier concept. Hospital charges in general surgery and surgical specialties under prospective payment systems, Ann Surg, 202, pp. 119-125, (1985)
[4]  
Munoz E., Soldano R., Laughlin A., Et al., Source of admission and cost: public hospitals face financial risk, Am J Public Health, 76, pp. 696-697, (1986)
[5]  
Munoz E., Wilkins S., Mallet E., Et al., Financial risk and hospital cost for elderly patients in non-age stratified urology DRGs, Urology, 33, pp. 445-448, (1989)
[6]  
Munoz E., Barrios E., Johnson H., Et al., Race and diagnostic related group prospective hospital payment for medical patients, J Natl Med Assoc, 81, pp. 844-848, (1989)
[7]  
Cohen E., Bernier D., Tam S., Et al., Data quality and DRGs: an assessment of the reliability of federal beneficiary discharge data in selected Manhattan hospitals, J Community Health, 10, pp. 238-246, (1985)
[8]  
Mueller E.J., Zeidman E.J., Desmond P.M., Et al., Reduction of length of stay and cost of transurethral resection of the prostate by early catheter removal, Br J Urol, 78, pp. 893-896, (1996)
[9]  
Holden M.O., Meeting diagnostic related group goals for elderly patients, Health Soc Work, 14, pp. 13-21, (1989)
[10]  
Caputi M.A., Heiss W.A., The DRG revolution, Health Soc Work, 9, pp. 5-12, (1984)