Receiver-operating characteristic analysis of multifocal VEPs to diagnose and quantify glaucomatous functional damage

被引:0
作者
Makoto Nakamura
Kumiko Ishikawa
Takayuki Nagai
Akira Negi
机构
[1] Kobe University,Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery
来源
Documenta Ophthalmologica | 2011年 / 123卷
关键词
Multifocal visual evoked potential; Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve; Signal-to-noise ratio; Glaucomatous optic neuropathy; Visual field; Global index;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To test whether multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) recording using two perpendicularly placed channels, as previously reported, to measure the degree of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) distribution overlap between a signal window and a noise window would efficiently detect and quantify glaucomatous damage. Humphrey visual field (HVF) and mfVEP were recorded from 56 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and mean deviation less than −15 dB and 62 age-matched ophthalmologically normal individuals. Areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (SNR-AUC) were calculated based on the proportion of mfVEP responses that exceeded a specific SNR criterion for both windows. Abnormal sectors with an SNR deviated from the previously established norm with P < 5% and 1% were counted. Diagnostic accuracy of the SNR-AUC was similar to that of the average total deviation (TD) of the HVF. The hemifield agreement to detect a defect in mfVEP and HVF was 77.1–87.3%, which was similar to previous reports using multiple channels. Correlation coefficients between SNR-AUC and average TD (0.74 in the upper hemifield and 0.65 in the lower) were significantly higher than those between the sums of abnormal locations on the mfVEP and HVF probability plots (0.27 and 0.33, respectively). Two perpendicular channels can detect and quantify functional damage due to glaucoma. The SNR-AUC may be used as a global index to quantify diffuse glaucomatous functional loss.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 108
页数:15
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
Baseler HA(1994)The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 90 65-81
[2]  
Sutter EE(1998)Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: improving objective detection of local visual field defects Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39 937-950
[3]  
Klein SA(2000)Objective perimetry in glaucoma Ophthalmology 107 2283-2299
[4]  
Carney T(2003)Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma Prog Retin Eye Res 22 201-251
[5]  
Klistorner AI(2002)A signal-to-noise analysis of multifocal VEP responses: an objective definition for poor records Doc Ophthalmol 104 287-302
[6]  
Graham SL(2003)Detecting glaucomatous damage with multifocal visual evoked potentials: How can a monocular test work? J Glaucoma 12 3-15
[7]  
Grigg JR(2000)An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: a possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41 1580-1587
[8]  
Billson FA(2002)Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss Am J Ophthalmol 133 29-39
[9]  
Klistorner A(2004)Test-retest variability of multifocal visual evoked potential and SITA standard perimetry in glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45 4035-4040
[10]  
Graham SL(2004)Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: a comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45 492-498