Predictive values of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation for fluid responsiveness in patients with pneumoperitoneum

被引:0
作者
Marko Zlicar
Vesna Novak-Jankovic
Rok Blagus
Maurizio Cecconi
机构
[1] University Medical Centre Ljubljana,Clinical Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy
[2] University of Ljubljana,Institute for Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Medical Faculty
[3] Adult Critical Care,undefined
[4] St. George’s Healthcare NHS Trust,undefined
来源
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | 2018年 / 32卷
关键词
Fluid responsiveness; Haemodynamics; Pneumoperitoneum; Dynamic predictors;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Animal studies suggest that dynamic predictors remain useful in patients with pneumoperitoneum, but human data is conflicting. Our aim was to determine predictive values of pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) in patients with pneumoperitoneum using LiDCORapid™ haemodynamic monitor. Standardised fluid challenges of colloid were administered to patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures, one fluid challenge per patient. Intra-abdominal pressure was automatically held at 12 mmHg. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in nominal stroke index (nSI) ≥ 10%. Linear regression was used to assess the ability of PPV and SVV to track the changes of nSI and logistic regression and area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) to assess the predictive value of PPV and SVV for fluid responsiveness. Threshold values for PPV and SVV were obtained using the “gray zone” approach. A p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. 56 patients were included in analysis. 41 patients (73%) responded to fluids. Both PPV and SVV tracked changes in nSI (Spearman correlation coefficients 0.34 for PPV and 0.53 for SVV). Odds ratio for fluid responsiveness for PPV was 1.163 (95% CI 1.01–1.34) and for SVV 1.341 (95% CI 1.10–1.63). PPV achieved an AUROC of 0.674 (95% CI 0.518–0.830) and SVV 0.80 (95% CI 0.668–0.932). The gray zone of PPV ranged between 6.5 and 20.5% and that of SVV between 7.5 and 13%. During pneumoperitoneum, as measured by LiDCORapid™, PPV and SVV can predict fluid responsiveness, however their sensitivity is lower than the one reported in conditions without pneumoperitoneum. Trial registry number: (with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry): ACTRN12612000456853.
引用
收藏
页码:825 / 832
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Assessment of stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness using the modified FloTrac™ and PiCCOplus™ system [J].
Christoph K Hofer ;
Alban Senn ;
Luc Weibel ;
Andreas Zollinger .
Critical Care, 12
[42]   Accuracy of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Zhongheng Zhang ;
Baolong Lu ;
Xiaoyan Sheng ;
Ni Jin .
Journal of Anesthesia, 2011, 25 :904-916
[43]   Accuracy of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Zhang, Zhongheng ;
Lu, Baolong ;
Sheng, Xiaoyan ;
Jin, Ni .
JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2011, 25 (06) :904-916
[44]   Pulse Pressure Variation Can Predict the Hemodynamic Response to Pneumoperitoneum in Dogs: A Retrospective Study [J].
Di Bella, Caterina ;
Lacitignola, Luca ;
Fracassi, Laura ;
Skouropoulou, Despoina ;
Crovace, Antonio ;
Staffieri, Francesco .
VETERINARY SCIENCES, 2019, 6 (01)
[45]   Fluid responsiveness is about stroke volume, and not pulse pressure Yogi: the power of Doppler fluid management and cardiovascular monitoring [J].
Phillips, Rob ;
Brierley, Joe .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2015, 29 (01) :197-200
[46]   Fluid responsiveness is about stroke volume, and not pulse pressure Yogi: the power of Doppler fluid management and cardiovascular monitoring [J].
Rob Phillips ;
Joe Brierley .
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2015, 29 :197-200
[47]   Respiratory pulse pressure variation fails to predict fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome [J].
Karim Lakhal ;
Stephan Ehrmann ;
Dalila Benzekri-Lefèvre ;
Isabelle Runge ;
Annick Legras ;
Pierre-François Dequin ;
Emmanuelle Mercier ;
Michel Wolff ;
Bernard Régnier ;
Thierry Boulain .
Critical Care, 15
[48]   Pulse pressure variation does not reflect stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated rats with lipopolysaccharide-induced pneumonia [J].
Cherpanath, Thomas G. V. ;
Smeding, Lonneke ;
Lagrand, Wim K. ;
Hirsch, Alexander ;
Schultz, Marcus J. ;
Groeneveld, Johan A. B. .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 41 (01) :98-104
[49]   Does pulse pressure variation predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Xiaobo Yang ;
Bin Du .
Critical Care, 18
[50]   Pulse pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with spontaneous breathing activity: a pragmatic observational study [J].
Grassi, P. ;
Lo Nigro, L. ;
Battaglia, K. ;
Barone, M. ;
Testa, F. ;
Berlot, G. .
HEART LUNG AND VESSELS, 2013, 5 (02) :98-109